Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 31;54(4):436-440.
doi: 10.5115/acb.21.101.

Radiologic evaluation of congenital anomalies of anterior and posterior arch of atlas in Omani subjects

Affiliations

Radiologic evaluation of congenital anomalies of anterior and posterior arch of atlas in Omani subjects

Ghaliya Al Hinai et al. Anat Cell Biol. .

Abstract

The atlas (C1) is known to present congenital anomalies in its anterior and posterior arches. The reported incidence of C1 anomalies is varied among the ethnic groups. We sought to determine the prevalence and various existing variations of C1 arch congenital anomalies in Omani subjects. This study was carried out by reviewing the cervical spine computed tomography scans of all the patients who had been referred to the Radiology Department, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital. Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were employed to analyse the data. A total of 663 subjects aged ≥18 years were included in the present study. Overall prevalence of C1 arch anomalies was 4.37% with 4.07% of isolated posterior arch anomalies, 0.3% of combined anterior and posterior arch anomalies. Among isolated posterior arch anomalies, type A and type B posterior arch defects were found in 3.77% and 0.3% of cases, respectively. Atlanto-occipital assimilation was noted in one case of total study subjects. The prevalence rate of C1 arch anomalies is relatively high in Omani subjects. The baseline data of C1 arch anomalies reported in the present study has a great impact on clinical practice, due to the fact that studying and evaluating the types of congenital anomalies helps in their accurate diagnosis and early intervention.

Keywords: Cervical vertebrae; Diagnosis; Prevalence; Radiology; Spine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Three dimensional reconstructed computed tomography scan showing the type A (A), type B (B) posterior arch defects, and combined anterior and posterior arch defect (C). The posterior view (B) of atlanto-occipital assimilation (D) is also seen.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Currarino G, Rollins N, Diehl JT. Congenital defects of the posterior arch of the atlas: a report of seven cases including an affected mother and son. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15:249–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dorne HL, Lander PH. CT recognition of anomalies of the posterior arch of the atlas vertebra: differentiation from fracture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1986;7:176–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karavelioglu E, Kacar E, Karavelioglu A, Gonul Y, Guven M. Congenital defect of the anterior arch of the atlas: a case report and review of the literature. Neurol India. 2014;62:303–4. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.136974. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kazanci B, Kahveci R, Ekici MA, Guclu B. Isolated fracture of anterior arch of atlas in a child: case report and review of the literature. Injury. 2013;44:1956–8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petre BM, Karp JE, Riley LH., 3rd Athletic cervical spine injury in the setting of fusion failure of the anterior and posterior atlas. Orthopedics. 2012;35:e1449–52. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120822-39. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources