Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 8;2(3):100041.
doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100041. Epub 2021 Jun 12.

Large-scale cross-cancer fine-mapping of the 5p15.33 region reveals multiple independent signals

Hongjie Chen  1 Arunabha Majumdar  2   3 Lu Wang  4 Siddhartha Kar  5 Kevin M Brown  6 Helian Feng  7 Constance Turman  8 Joe Dennis  9 Douglas Easton  9 Kyriaki Michailidou  10   11 Jacques Simard  12 Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC)Timothy Bishop  13 Iona C Cheng  14 Jeroen R Huyghe  15 Stephanie L Schmit  16 Colorectal Transdisciplinary Study (CORECT)Colon Cancer Family Registry Study (CCFR)Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO)Tracy A O'Mara  17 Amanda B Spurdle  17 Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium (ECAC)Puya Gharahkhani  18 Johannes Schumacher  19 Janusz Jankowski  20   21 Ines Gockel  22 Esophageal Cancer GWAS ConsortiumMelissa L Bondy  23 Richard S Houlston  24 Robert B Jenkins  25 Beatrice Melin  26 Glioma International Case Control Consortium (GICC)Corina Lesseur  27   28 Andy R Ness  29   30 Brenda Diergaarde  31   32 Andrew F Olshan  33   34 Head-Neck Cancer GWAS ConsortiumChristopher I Amos  35 David C Christiani  8   36 Maria T Landi  6 James D McKay  28 International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO)Myriam Brossard  37   38 Mark M Iles  39 Matthew H Law  18   40 Stuart MacGregor  18 Melanoma GWAS ConsortiumJonathan Beesley  17 Michelle R Jones  41 Jonathan Tyrer  42 Stacey J Winham  43 Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC)Alison P Klein  44   45 Gloria Petersen  43 Donghui Li  46 Brian M Wolpin  47 Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PANC4)Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium (PanScan)Rosalind A Eeles  48   49 Christopher A Haiman  50 Zsofia Kote-Jarai  48   49 Fredrick R Schumacher  51   52 PRACTICAL consortiumCRUKBPC3CAPSPEGASUSPaul Brennan  29 Stephen J Chanock  6 Valerie Gaborieau  29 Mark P Purdue  6 Renal Cancer GWAS ConsortiumPaul Pharoah  9 Rayjean J Hung  38 Laufey T Amundadottir  6 Peter Kraft  7   8 Bogdan Pasaniuc  2   53   54 Sara Lindström  1   15
Affiliations

Large-scale cross-cancer fine-mapping of the 5p15.33 region reveals multiple independent signals

Hongjie Chen et al. HGG Adv. .

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified thousands of cancer risk loci revealing many risk regions shared across multiple cancers. Characterizing the cross-cancer shared genetic basis can increase our understanding of global mechanisms of cancer development. In this study, we collected GWAS summary statistics based on up to 375,468 cancer cases and 530,521 controls for fourteen types of cancer, including breast (overall, estrogen receptor [ER]-positive, and ER-negative), colorectal, endometrial, esophageal, glioma, head/neck, lung, melanoma, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, and renal cancer, to characterize the shared genetic basis of cancer risk. We identified thirteen pairs of cancers with statistically significant local genetic correlations across eight distinct genomic regions. Specifically, the 5p15.33 region, harboring the TERT and CLPTM1L genes, showed statistically significant local genetic correlations for multiple cancer pairs. We conducted a cross-cancer fine-mapping of the 5p15.33 region based on eight cancers that showed genome-wide significant associations in this region (ER-negative breast, colorectal, glioma, lung, melanoma, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer). We used an iterative analysis pipeline implementing a subset-based meta-analysis approach based on cancer-specific conditional analyses and identified ten independent cross-cancer associations within this region. For each signal, we conducted cross-cancer fine-mapping to prioritize the most plausible causal variants. Our findings provide a more in-depth understanding of the shared inherited basis across human cancers and expand our knowledge of the 5p15.33 region in carcinogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

B.M.W. has received research grants from Celgene and Eli Lilly and has consulting relationship with BioLineRx, Celgene, and Grail. R.A.E. has received speaker honoraria from the GU-ASCO meeting (January 2016), RMH FR meeting (November 2017, supported by Janssen), University of Chicago invited talk (May 2018), and ESMO (September 2019, supported by Bayer & Ipsen) and served as member of external expert committee at the Prostate Dx Advisory Panel (June 2020). All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analytical pipeline for the study Regions with significant pairwise local genetic correlation were first identified by ρHESS. For regions harboring disproportionally high shared heritability across cancers, joint test of ASSET two-sided meta-analysis and COJO conditional analysis was then repeatedly conducted to identify independent signals, until no variant reached genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10−8) in two-sided ASSET meta-analysis. For each signal, GWAS summary statistics conditional on other signals of selected cancer were used in multi-trait fine-mapping to estimate the posterior probability of being causal.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pairwise local genetic correlation between selected cancer types at chromosome 5p15.33 (982,252–2,132,442 bp) Cancer pairs with statistically significant (p value < 0.05/1,703 = 2.94 × 10−5) local genetic correlation are annotated with an asterisk.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Categorizing 14 cancer types into three tiers based on their p value distribution at 5p15.33 Pattern A cancers (A) have one single peak by the TERT gene; pattern B cancers (B) have a broader signal at the CLPTM1L gene as well as a signal by the TERT gene; pattern C cancers (C) have no genome-wide significant association in this region. Genome-wide significant levels at p value = 5 × 10−8 are marked with red dashed line in (A)–(C). Distribution of Z scores at the 5p15.33 region from the GWAS results of ER-negative breast, glioma, and prostate cancer (D). Only variants with p < 0.05 for both cancers are included. While the associations for ER-negative breast cancer and glioma overlap, the SNP associations with ER-negative breast cancer and prostate, as well as glioma and prostate, are in opposite directions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of two-sided subset-based meta-analysis p values across eight cancer types at the 5p15.33 region Index variants of ten independent candidate signals, identified by the iterative COJO-ASSET analysis, are annotated and marked in red.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Correlation matrix showing the pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) between 10 candidate signals, identified using an iterative COJO-ASSET analysis LD was calculated based on the European ancestry populations in 1000 Genomes (1000G) Project.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Open chromatin in different cancer types Genomic location of tissue-specific open chromatin narrow peaks, which were used as functional prior in the fine-mapping analysis.

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. W.H.O . 2020. GLOBOCAN 2020.https://gco.iarc.fr/
    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:7–33. - PubMed
    1. Lichtenstein P., Holm N.V., Verkasalo P.K., Iliadou A., Kaprio J., Koskenvuo M., Pukkala E., Skytthe A., Hemminki K. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;343:78–85. - PubMed
    1. Mucci L.A., Hjelmborg J.B., Harris J.R., Czene K., Havelick D.J., Scheike T., Graff R.E., Holst K., Möller S., Unger R.H., et al. Nordic Twin Study of Cancer (NorTwinCan) Collaboration Familial Risk and Heritability of Cancer Among Twins in Nordic Countries. JAMA. 2016;315:68–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rashkin S.R., Graff R.E., Kachuri L., Thai K.K., Alexeeff S.E., Blatchins M.A., Cavazos T.B., Corley D.A., Emami N.C., Hoffman J.D., et al. Pan-cancer study detects genetic risk variants and shared genetic basis in two large cohorts. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:4423. - PMC - PubMed