Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;54(2):780-794.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01645-y. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

Performance on the processing portion of complex working memory span tasks is related to working memory capacity estimates

Lauren L Richmond  1 , Lois K Burnett  2 , Alexandra B Morrison  3 , B Hunter Ball  4
Affiliations

Performance on the processing portion of complex working memory span tasks is related to working memory capacity estimates

Lauren L Richmond et al. Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr.

Erratum in

Abstract

Individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) have long been known to relate to performance in domains outside of WM, including attentional control, long-term memory, problem-solving, and fluid intelligence to name a few. Complex span WM tasks, composed of a processing component and a storage component, are often used to index WMC in these types of investigations. Capacity estimates are derived from performance on the storage component only, while processing performance is often largely ignored. Here, we explore the relationship between processing performance and WMC in a large dataset for each of three complex span tasks to better characterize how the components of these tasks might be related. We provide evidence that enforcing an 85% or better accuracy criterion for the processing portion of the task results in the removal of a disproportionate number of individuals exhibiting lower WMC estimates. We also find broad support for differences in processing task performance, characterized according to both accuracy and reaction time metrics, as a function of WMC. We suggest that researchers may want to include processing task performance measures, in addition to capacity estimates, in studies using complex span tasks to index WMC. This approach may better characterize the relationships between complex span task performance and performance in disparate domains of cognition.

Keywords: Complex span task; Individual differences; Processing; Storage; Working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Akaike, H. (1985). Prediction and Entropy. In E. Parzen, K. Tanabe, & G. Kitagawa (Eds.), Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike (pp. 387–410). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_30
    1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory (pp. 267–281). Akadémiai Kiadó.
    1. Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (pp. 47–89). Academic Press.
    1. Ball, B. H., & Brewer, G. A. (2018). Proactive control processes in event-based prospective memory: Evidence from intraindividual variability and ex-Gaussian analyses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(5), 793–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000489 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2011). Moving beyond the mean in studies of mental chronometry: The power of response time distributional analyses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411408885 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources