Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 14;11(7):1027.
doi: 10.3390/biom11071027.

Prevention of Post-Operative Adhesions: A Comprehensive Review of Present and Emerging Strategies

Affiliations
Review

Prevention of Post-Operative Adhesions: A Comprehensive Review of Present and Emerging Strategies

Ali Fatehi Hassanabad et al. Biomolecules. .

Abstract

Post-operative adhesions affect patients undergoing all types of surgeries. They are associated with serious complications, including higher risk of morbidity and mortality. Given increased hospitalization, longer operative times, and longer length of hospital stay, post-surgical adhesions also pose a great financial burden. Although our knowledge of some of the underlying mechanisms driving adhesion formation has significantly improved over the past two decades, literature has yet to fully explain the pathogenesis and etiology of post-surgical adhesions. As a result, finding an ideal preventative strategy and leveraging appropriate tissue engineering strategies has proven to be difficult. Different products have been developed and enjoyed various levels of success along the translational tissue engineering research spectrum, but their clinical translation has been limited. Herein, we comprehensively review the agents and products that have been developed to mitigate post-operative adhesion formation. We also assess emerging strategies that aid in facilitating precision and personalized medicine to improve outcomes for patients and our healthcare system.

Keywords: barriers; biomaterials; immune mediators; pharmaceuticals; post-surgical adhesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Diamond M.P., Freeman M.L. Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2001;7:567–576. doi: 10.1093/humupd/7.6.567. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lauder C.I., Garcea G., Strickland A., Maddern G.J. Abdominal Adhesion Prevention: Still a Sticky Subject. Dig. Surg. 2010;27:347–358. doi: 10.1159/000314805. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weibel M.-A., Majno G. Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery: A postmortem study. Am. J. Surg. 1973;126:345–353. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(73)80123-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Menzies D., Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions—How big is the problem? Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1990;72:60–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arung W., Meurisse M., Detry O. Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. World J. Gastroenterol. 2011;17:4545–4553. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i41.4545. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances