Are There Personality Differences between Rural vs. Urban-Living Individuals of a Specialist Ground Beetle, Carabus convexus?
- PMID: 34357306
- PMCID: PMC8304727
- DOI: 10.3390/insects12070646
Are There Personality Differences between Rural vs. Urban-Living Individuals of a Specialist Ground Beetle, Carabus convexus?
Abstract
The world-wide, rapid urbanization is leading to substantial changes in environmental and habitat conditions. These changes, as well as disturbances accompanying urbanization have considerable effects at various levels of the biological organization on wildlife. Understanding behavioral responses to such changes is essential for identifying which organisms may successfully adapt to the altered conditions. In this study, individuals of a forest specialist ground beetle, Carabus convexus, from rural and urban forest patches were tested for their exploratory and risk-taking behavior. Beetles responded consistently in the different contexts; furthermore, by behaving consistently over time, demonstrated that they had personalities. Agglomerative cluster analysis identified two groups of behavioral traits: the exploratory and the risk-taking dimension of personality. Urban females were significantly more exploratory than urban males which can be an adaptation to find high quality food needed to mature eggs in urban habitats, as well as to select favorable microsites for oviposition. Moreover, urban females and males showed more risk-taking behavior than rural females. Urban beetles with more risk-taking behavior may be better able to cope with frequent urbanization-driven disturbance events.
Keywords: carabid; exploratory behavior; human disturbance; personality; risk-taking behavior; urbanization.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Differences in Morphology of Rural vs. Urban Individuals of the Flightless Ground Beetle, Carabus convexus.Insects. 2025 Apr 19;16(4):430. doi: 10.3390/insects16040430. Insects. 2025. PMID: 40332951 Free PMC article.
-
Urban Individuals of Three Rove Beetle Species Are Not More Exploratory or Risk-Taking Than Rural Conspecifics.Insects. 2022 Aug 22;13(8):757. doi: 10.3390/insects13080757. Insects. 2022. PMID: 36005382 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in Life History Traits in Rural vs. Urban Populations of a Specialist Ground Beetle, Carabus convexus.Insects. 2021 Jun 10;12(6):540. doi: 10.3390/insects12060540. Insects. 2021. PMID: 34200777 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioural responses of wildlife to urban environments.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013 Aug;88(3):537-49. doi: 10.1111/brv.12012. Epub 2012 Dec 24. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013. PMID: 23279382 Review.
-
A review of urban wildlife management from the animal personality perspective: The case of urban deer.Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 10;644:576-582. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.335. Epub 2018 Jul 11. Sci Total Environ. 2018. PMID: 29990907 Review.
Cited by
-
Urbanization increases fluctuating asymmetry and affects behavioral traits of a common grasshopper.Ecol Evol. 2022 Dec 21;12(12):e9658. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9658. eCollection 2022 Dec. Ecol Evol. 2022. PMID: 36568863 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in Morphology of Rural vs. Urban Individuals of the Flightless Ground Beetle, Carabus convexus.Insects. 2025 Apr 19;16(4):430. doi: 10.3390/insects16040430. Insects. 2025. PMID: 40332951 Free PMC article.
-
Urban Individuals of Three Rove Beetle Species Are Not More Exploratory or Risk-Taking Than Rural Conspecifics.Insects. 2022 Aug 22;13(8):757. doi: 10.3390/insects13080757. Insects. 2022. PMID: 36005382 Free PMC article.
-
Sex-Specific Effect of the Dietary Protein to Carbohydrate Ratio on Personality in the Dubia Cockroach.Insects. 2022 Jan 27;13(2):133. doi: 10.3390/insects13020133. Insects. 2022. PMID: 35206707 Free PMC article.
-
Personality as a Predictor of Time-Activity Budget in Lion-Tailed Macaques (Macaca silenus).Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 8;12(12):1495. doi: 10.3390/ani12121495. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35739832 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McIntyre N.E. Urban Ecology—Definitions and Goals. In: Douglas I., Goode D., Houck M., Wang R., editors. The Routledge Handbook of Urban Ecology. Routledge; London, UK: 2011. pp. 7–16.
-
- McKinney M.L. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol. Conserv. 2006;127:247–260. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005. - DOI
-
- Forman R.T.T. Urban Regions: Ecology and Planning beyond the City. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2008.
-
- Niemelä J. Ecology and urban planning. Biodivers. Conserv. 1999;8:119–131. doi: 10.1023/A:1008817325994. - DOI
-
- Simon E., Harangi S., Baranyai E., Braun M., Fábián I., Mizser S., Nagy L., Tóthmérész B. Distribution of toxic elements between biotic and abiotic components of terrestrial ecosystem along an urbanization gradient: Soil, leaf litter and ground beetles. Ecol. Indic. 2016;60:258–264. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.045. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources