Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 1;95(1131):20210413.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210413. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

Optimal biopsy approach for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

Affiliations
Review

Optimal biopsy approach for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

Simona Ippoliti et al. Br J Radiol. .

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic and therapeutic work-up has evolved significantly in the last decade, with pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI now widely endorsed within international guidelines. There is potential to move away from the widespread use of systematic biopsy cores and towards an individualised risk-stratified approach. However, the evidence on the optimal biopsy approach remains heterogeneous, and the aim of this review is to highlight the most relevant features following a critical assessment of the literature. The commonest biopsy approaches are via the transperineal (TP) or transrectal (TR) routes. The former is considered more advantageous due to its negligible risk of post-procedural sepsis and reduced need for antimicrobial prophylaxis; the more recent development of local anaesthetic (LA) methods now makes this approach feasible in the clinic. Beyond this, several techniques are available, including cognitive registration, MRI-Ultrasound fusion imaging and direct MRI in-bore guided biopsy. Evidence shows that performing targeted biopsies reduces the number of cores required and can achieve acceptable rates of detection whilst helping to minimise complications and reducing pathologist workloads and costs to health-care facilities. Pre-biopsy MRI has revolutionised the diagnostic pathway for PCa, and optimising the biopsy process is now a focus. Combining MR imaging, TP biopsy and a more widespread use of LA in an outpatient setting seems a reasonable solution to balance health-care costs and benefits, however, local choices are likely to depend on the expertise and experience of clinicians and on the technology available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Example of an MRI fusion template-guided transperineal biopsy technique (BiopSeeTM, Medcom).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Example MRI fusion transperineal prostate biopsy using in-line needle guidance under local anaesthetic (UronavTM, Philips): Prostate MRI (top right) with contoured prostate (pink) and lesion (top left; green/blue); the needle guide is mounted to the probe (bottom left) to allow needle tracking within the sagittal plain; 3D animated documentation of the prostate, lesion and current plain.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Flowchart of decision steps in prostate biopsy. SA, prostate-specific antigen; TR, transrectal; TP, transperitoneal.

References

    1. Smittenaar CR, Petersen KA, Stewart K, Moitt N. Cancer incidence and mortality projections in the UK until 2035. Br J Cancer 2016; 115(no. 9): 1147–55. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.304 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell KJL, Del Mar C, Wright G, Dickinson J, Glasziou P. Prevalence of incidental prostate cancer: a systematic review of autopsy studies. Int J Cancer 2015; 137(no. 7): 1749–57. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29538 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Leenders GJLH, van der Kwast TH, Iczkowski KA. The 2019 International Society of urological pathology consensus conference on prostate cancer grading. Eur Urol 2021; 79: 87–99. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Briers E, Briers E, et al. Guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Assoc Urol 2020; 65: 124–37. - PubMed
    1. Sataloff RT, Johns MM, Kost KM. American College of Radiology - Prostate MRI model policy. 2019;.

MeSH terms