Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 2;13(15):3886.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13153886.

Why Do Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Fare Better Than Adults?

Affiliations
Review

Why Do Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Fare Better Than Adults?

Alexandra Neaga et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

It is a new and exciting time for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). While nearly 50 years ago, only one in nine children with ALL survived with chemotherapy, nowadays nearly 90% of children have a chance of long-term survival. Adults with ALL, as well as the special category of adolescents and young adult (AYA) patients, are catching up with the new developments seen in children, but still their prognosis is much worse. A plethora of factors are regarded as responsible for the differences in treatment response, such as age, ethnicity, disease biology, treatment regimens and toxicities, drug tolerance and resistance, minimal residual disease evaluation, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation timing and socio-economic factors. Taking these factors into account, bringing pediatric-like protocols to adult patient management and incorporating new agents into frontline treatment could be the key to improve the survival rates in adults and AYA.

Keywords: acute lymphoblastic leukemia; adolescents and young adults; differences in treatment response; novel therapies; pediatric-like protocols; prognosis; survival rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The schematic mechanisms of action of novel therapies. The mechanism of action of monoclonal antibody Rituximab (antiCD20), Daratumumab (antiCD38), antibody–drug conjugate Inotuzumab ozogamicin (antiCD22), bi-specific antibody Blinatumomab (CD3 antiCD19 T cell engager) and CAR-T cells (followed by expansion and differentiation after infusion).

References

    1. Frei E., 3rd, Sallan S.E. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Treatment. Cancer. 1978;42:828–838. - PubMed
    1. Ledford H. The perfect blend. Nature. 2016;532:162–164. doi: 10.1038/532162a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kansagra A., Litzow M. Treatment of Young Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Curr. Hematol. Malign. Rep. 2017;12:187–196. doi: 10.1007/s11899-017-0377-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hochberg J., Khaled S., Forman S.J., Cairo M.S. Criteria for and outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant in children, adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission. Br. J. Haematol. 2013;161:27–42. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12239. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hallbook H., Gustafsson G., Smedmyr B., Soderhall S., Heyman M., Swedish Adult Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Group Treatment outcome in young adults and children >10 years of age with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Sweden: A comparison between a pediatric protocol and an adult protocol. Cancer. 2006;107:1551–1561. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22189. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources