Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 22;18(15):7775.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157775.

The Relationship between Students' Physical Self-Concept and Their Physical Activity Levels and Sedentary Behavior: The Role of Students' Motivation

Affiliations

The Relationship between Students' Physical Self-Concept and Their Physical Activity Levels and Sedentary Behavior: The Role of Students' Motivation

Juan J Pulido et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the association between specific dimension (i.e., fitness, appearance, physical competence, physical strength, and self-esteem) of students' physical self-concept (PSC) and their physical activity (PA) levels (i.e., intentions to be physically active and out-of-school PA levels perceived by students) and sedentary behavior (SB) (i.e., total sitting and screen time perceived by students). We also tested the role of students' motivation (i.e., intrinsic motivation and amotivation) towards PA in these relationships. A total of 1998 Spanish male (n = 1003) and female (n = 995) secondary students, aged between 13 and 17 years (M = 14.92, SD = 0.87) from 22 schools, enrolled in third grade (n = 1081) and fourth grade (n = 917), completed the self-reported questionnaires. Five independent structural equation modeling (SEM) adjusted by students' sex was used to examine the association between specific dimension of students' PSC (i.e., fitness, appearance, physical competence, physical strength, and self-esteem) and self-reported PA and SB variables, and to test the role of students' motivation in these relationships. Overall, most of students' PSC dimension positively predicted students' PA outcomes, and were negatively associated with SB. In addition, most of students' PSC dimension were positively associated with intrinsic motivation, and negatively predicted amotivation. In turn, intrinsic motivation was a positive predictor of PA outcomes, and a negative predictor of SB, whereas amotivation was a negative predictor of PA outcomes and sitting time, and a positive predictor of screen time. Finally, from PSC dimensions, sex as a covariate was a positive predictor of intrinsic motivation and PA outcomes, and was a negative predictor of amotivation and sitting time. These findings suggest the importance of the specific dimensions of PSC perceived by adolescents on their motivational processes, and in turn, on their PA and SB outcomes.

Keywords: adolescence; fitness; motivation; physical self-perceptions; sedentary behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The standardized coefficients from students’ fitness to intrinsic motivation and amotivation, and to outcomes. Note. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The standardized coefficients from students’ appearance to intrinsic motivation and amotivation, and to outcomes. Note. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The standardized coefficients from students’ physical competence to intrinsic motivation and amotivation, and to outcomes. Note. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The standardized coefficients from students’ physical strength to intrinsic motivation and amotivation, and to outcomes. Note. p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The standardized coefficients from students’ self-esteem to intrinsic motivation and amotivation, and to outcomes. Note. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Poitras V.J., Gray C.E., Borghese M.M., Carson V., Chaput J.P., Janssen I., Katzmarzyk P.T., Pate R.R., Connor Gorber S., Kho M.E., et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2016;41:197–239. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0663. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sallis J.F., Prochaska J.J., Taylor W.C. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2000;32:963–975. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200005000-00014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2020. [(accessed on 26 November 2020)]. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/337001.
    1. Rhodes R.E., Janssen I., Bredin S.S., Warburton D.E., Bauman A. Physical activity: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychol. Health. 2017;32:942–975. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1325486. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chaput J.P., Willumsen J., Bull F., Chou R., Ekelund U., Firth J., Katzmarzyk P.T. 2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5–17 years: Summary of the evidence. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020;17:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01037-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types