The WOMEN-UP Solution, a Patient-Centered Innovative e-Health Tool for Pelvic Floor Muscle Training: Qualitative and Usability Study during Early-Stage Development
- PMID: 34360093
- PMCID: PMC8345479
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18157800
The WOMEN-UP Solution, a Patient-Centered Innovative e-Health Tool for Pelvic Floor Muscle Training: Qualitative and Usability Study during Early-Stage Development
Abstract
e-Health may enhance self-management of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI). It is crucial to involve patients in planning, developing and monitoring the optimal e-Health solution. This research aims to describe patient-centered innovation in an early developmental stage of the WOMEN-UP solution. We conducted a qualitative study through a self-developed questionnaire in 22 women with SUI, to define system requirements from a patient's perspective. The first prototype of the WOMEN-UP solution was developed. It was tested by 9 patients in a usability study (think-aloud protocol and retrospective interviews). Patient preferences regarding the possible use of an e-Health solution with serious games for PFMT were: (1) to receive feedback about PFMT; (2) convenient home-use; (3) increasing motivation; (4) available in medical centers. Identified usability aids (31) reassured our design-development plan, which considered the biofeedback and serious games as key factors. Patient's perspective detected some unexpected issues related to the calibration and serious games, involving a change in the ongoing development to get an improved WOMEN-UP solution; the value of patient-centered innovation during the development of an e-Health solution for PFMT (WOMEN-UP solution). To identify patients' unmet needs, we proposed a longitudinal approach for the future eHealth-related patient-centered innovations.
Keywords: biofeedback; eHealth; patient-centered innovation; pelvic floor muscle training; qualitative study; serious games; urinary incontinence; usability study.
Conflict of interest statement
The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Milsom I., Altman D., Cartwrigth R., Lapitan M.C., Nelson R., Sjöström S., Tikkinen K.a.O. Epidemiology of urinary incontinence (UI) and other lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and anal (AI)incontinence. In: Abrams P., Cardozo L., Wagg A., Wein A., editors. International Consultation on Incontinence. 6th ed. Health Publications Ltd.; London, UK: 2017. pp. 1–142.
-
- Dumoulin C. Adult Conservative Management. Committee 12. In: Abrams P., Cardozo L., Wagg A., Wein A., editors. International Consultation on Incontinence. 6th ed. Health Publications Ltd.; London, UK: 2017. pp. 1443–1628.
-
- Novara G., Checcucci E., Crestani A., Abrate A., Esperto F., Pavan N., De Nunzio C., Galfano A., Giannarini G., Gregori A., et al. Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic? Eur. Urol. 2020;78:786–811. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Grimes C.L., Balk E.M., Crisp C.C., Antosh D.D., Murphy M., Halder G.E., Jeppson P.C., Lebrun E.E.W., Raman S., Kim-Fine S., et al. A guide for urogynecologic patient care utilizing telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: Review of existing evidence. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2020;31:1063–1089. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04314-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
