Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 6;11(8):e048019.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048019.

Instruments for assessing health professionals' skills in breaking bad news: protocol for a systematic review of measurement properties

Daniel Gutierrez-Sanchez  1 , Marina García-Gámez  2 , Juan Pablo Leiva-Santos  3 , Inmaculada Lopez-Leiva  1
Affiliations

Instruments for assessing health professionals' skills in breaking bad news: protocol for a systematic review of measurement properties

Daniel Gutierrez-Sanchez et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Health professionals are often involved in the process of breaking bad news (BBN), which remains a difficult challenge, as it requires not only theoretical knowledge, but also the development of humanistic, emotional and communication skills. Therefore, optimal BBN assessment is essential. In this regard, sound measurement instruments are needed to evaluate BBN properly in research, teaching and clinical settings. Several instruments have been designed and validated to assess BBN. In this context, choosing the most appropriate instrument for assessing health professionals' skills in BBN is essential. The aims of this systematic review are to: (1) identify all the instruments used for assessing health professionals' skills in BBN; and (2) critically appraise their measurement properties.

Methods: A systematic review will be undertaken according to the most up-to-date COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments' (COSMIN) methodology. The protocol of this systematic review was developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search strategy will be performed following the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. The search strategy will be conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, SciELO and Open Grey. Two review authors will independently appraise the full-text articles according to the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Quality ratings and evidence synthesis will be performed using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not necessary for systematic review protocols. The results will be disseminated by publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020207586.

Keywords: adult palliative care; mental health; palliative care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Paul M. Breaking bad news. Acad Med 2018;93:1390. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002316 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dean A, Willis S. The use of protocol in breaking bad news: evidence and ethos. Int J Palliat Nurs 2016;22:265–71. 10.12968/ijpn.2016.22.6.265 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Corey VR, Gwyn PG. Experiences of nurse practitioners in communicating bad news to cancer patients. J Adv Pract Oncol 2016;7:485–94. 10.6004/jadpro.2016.7.5.2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luz R, George A, Spitz E, et al. . Breaking bad news in prenatal medicine: a literature review. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2017;35:14–31. 10.1080/02646838.2016.1253052 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fontes CMB, Menezes DVde, Borgato MH, et al. . Communicating bad news: an integrative review of the nursing literature. Rev Bras Enferm 2017;70:1089–95. 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0143 - DOI - PubMed