Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 7;23(9):130.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01542-y.

18F-FDG PET/CT in Infective Endocarditis: Indications and Approaches for Standardization

Affiliations
Review

18F-FDG PET/CT in Infective Endocarditis: Indications and Approaches for Standardization

D Ten Hove et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Additional imaging modalities, such as FDG-PET/CT, have been included into the workup for patients with suspected infective endocarditis, according to major international guidelines published in 2015. The purpose of this review is to give an overview of FDG-PET/CT indications and standardized approaches in the setting of suspected infective endocarditis.

Recent findings: There are two main indications for performing FDG-PET/CT in patients with suspected infective endocarditis: (i) detecting intracardiac infections and (ii) detection of (clinically silent) disseminated infectious disease. The diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT for intracardiac lesions depends on the presence of native valves, prosthetic valves, or implanted cardiac devices, with a sensitivity that is poor for native valve endocarditis and cardiac device-related lead infections, but much better for prosthetic valve endocarditis and cardiac device-related pocket infections. Specificity is high for all these indications. The detection of disseminated disease may also help establish the diagnosis and/or impact patient management. Based on current evidence, FDG-PET/CT should be considered for detection of disseminated disease in suspected endocarditis. Absence of intracardiac lesions on FDG-PET/CT cannot rule out native valve endocarditis, but positive findings strongly support the diagnosis. For prosthetic valve endocarditis, standard use of FDG-PET/CT is recommended because of its high sensitivity and specificity. For implanted cardiac devices, FDG-PET/CT is also recommended, but should be evaluated with careful attention to clinical context, because its sensitivity is high for pocket infections, but low for lead infections. In patients with prosthetic valves with or without additional aortic prosthesis, combination with CTA should be considered. Optimal timing of FDG-PET/CT is important, both during clinical workup and technically (i.e., post tracer injection). In addition, procedural standardization is key and encompasses patient preparation, scan acquisition, reconstruction, subsequent analysis, and clinical interpretation. The recommendations discussed here will hopefully contribute to improved standardization and enhanced performance of FDG-PET/CT in the clinical management of patients with suspected infective endocarditis.

Keywords: Endocarditis; FDG; Indications; PET/CT; Standardization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. ten Hove, Dr. Glaudemans, Dr. Slart, and Dr. Sinha report the aforementioned institutional funding through PUSH. Additionally, Dr. Sinha reports grants from Beatrixoord Foundation, grants from the European Union, outside the submitted work, and Committee work (executive boards) on a local and national level dealing with guideline development of infections. Dr. Budde reports grants from HeartFlow and Siemens, outside the submitted work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of FDG-PET/CT indications for suspected IE and standardization strategies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PET/CT angiography. Clinical case which demonstrates the additional value of combining FDG-PET and CTA. FDG-PET shows increased uptake at the edge of the prosthetic aortic valve, indicative of abscess formation (upper and lower left), but does not show the vegetation (yellow arrows) that is visible on CTA (diastolic phase: upper right; systolic phase: lower right). (This figure was published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Imaging, Vol 9, Scholtens AM, Swart LE, Verberne HJ, Tanis W, Lam MG, Budde RP, Confounders in FDG-PET/CT Imaging of Suspected Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis, Pages 1462-1465, Copyright Elsevier [2016]) [36]

References

    1. Cahill TJ, Prendergast BD. Infective endocarditis. Lancet. 2016;387(10021):882–893. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00067-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jensen AD, Bundgaard H, Butt JH, Bruun NE, Voldstedlund M, Torp-Pedersen C, Gislason G, Iversen K, Chamat S, Dahl A, Køber L, Østergaard L, Fosbøl EL. Temporal changes in the incidence of infective endocarditis in Denmark 1997-2017: a nationwide study. Int J Cardiol. 2021;326:145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.10.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heredia-Rodríguez M, Hernández A, Bustamante-Munguira J, Álvarez FJ, Eiros JM, Castrodeza J, Tamayo E. Evolution of the incidence, mortality, and cost of infective endocarditis in Spain between 1997 and 2014. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(10):1610–1613. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4514-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van den Brink FS, Swaans MJ, Hoogendijk MG, Alipour A, Kelder JC, Jaarsma W, Eefting FD, Groenmeijer B, Kupper AJF, Ten Berg JM. Increased incidence of infective endocarditis after the 2009 European Society of Cardiology guideline update: a nationwide study in the Netherlands. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017;3(2):141–147. - PubMed
    1. Sunder S, Grammatico-Guillon L, Lemaignen A, Lacasse M, Gaborit C, Boutoille D, Tattevin P, Denes E, Guimard T, Dupont M, Fauchier L, Bernard L. Incidence, characteristics, and mortality of infective endocarditis in France in 2011. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223857. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances