Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug;25(4):883-890.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02468-8. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

Prevalence and risk factors for diastasis recti abdominis: a review and proposal of a new anatomical variation

Affiliations
Review

Prevalence and risk factors for diastasis recti abdominis: a review and proposal of a new anatomical variation

M Cavalli et al. Hernia. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) or rectus diastasis is an acquired condition in which the rectus muscles are separated by an abnormal distance along their length, but with no fascia defect. To data there is no consensus about risk factors for DRA. The aim of this article is to critically review the literature about prevalence and risk factor of DRA.

Method: A total of 13 papers were identified.

Results: The real prevalence of DRA is unknown because the prevalence rate varies with measurement method, measurement site and judgment criteria, but it is certainly an extremely frequent condition. Numbers of parity, BMI, diabetes are the most plausible risk factors. We identified a new anatomical variation in cadaveric dissection and in abdominal CT image evaluation: along the semilunar line the internal oblique aponeurosis could join the rectus sheath with only a posterior layer, so without a double layer (anterior and posterior) as usually described. We conducted a retrospective review of abdominal CT images and the presence of the posterior insertion only could be considered as a risk factor for DRA.

Conclusion: Further studies with large sample size, including nulliparous, primiparous, pluriparous and men too, are necessary for identify the real prevalence.

Keywords: Abdominal rectus muscle; Diastasis recti abdominis; Intra-rectus distance; Risk factor; Semilunar line.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Reinpold W, Köckerling F, Bittner R, Conze J, Fortelny R, Koch A, Kukleta J, Kuthe A, Lorenz R, Stechemesser B. Classification of rectus diastasis—a proposal by the German Hernia Society (DHG) and the International Endohernia Society (IEHS) Front Surg. 2019;6:1. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mommers EHH, Ponten JEH, Al Olmar AK, et al. The general surgeon’s perspective of rectus diastasis. A systematic review of treatment options. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:4934–4949. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5607-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brauman D. Diastasis recti: clinical anatomy. Plast Recosntr Surg. 2008;122(5):1564–1569. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181882493. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Köhler G, Kuketina RR, Emmanuel K. Sutured repair of primary small umbilical and epigastric hernias: concomitant rectus diastasis is a significant risk factor for recurrence. World J Surg. 2015;39:121–126. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2765-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mota PGFD, Pascoal AG, Bø K. Diastasis recti abdominis in pregnancy and postpartum period. Risk factors, functional implications and resolution. Curr Womens Health Rev. 2015;11:59–67. doi: 10.2174/157340481101150914201735. - DOI

Publication types