Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Jul;279(7):3297-3300.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07025-8. Epub 2021 Aug 7.

Remote assessments for bone conduction hearing devices during the COVID-19 pandemic

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Remote assessments for bone conduction hearing devices during the COVID-19 pandemic

Kimberley Lau et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic had resulted in the suspension of many routine audiology services due to the risk of cross-infections in closed spaces. This has driven the need for exploring alternatives to conventional face-to-face consultations in the hospital outpatient setting. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of remote consultations and assessments for patients on the waiting list for consideration of bone conduction hearing devices (BCHDs), and whether this type of consultation could continue beyond the COVID-19 era.

Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional study in a tertiary Neuro-otology Department. All new patients on the waiting list for assessment for BCHD as of 1 March 2020 were included. Patients' case notes were reviewed. All underwent a telephone consultation with an implant audiologist. If the patient wanted to go ahead with the remote trial, a BCHD sound processor on a headband would be mailed out and the patient would then have to use the device for two weeks and return the device after with their diary.

Results: There were 49 patients. The mean age was 55 (range 27-88, SD 16.3). Four did not proceed with the trial. All patients returned their devices to the department. Majority of patients (95.6%, n = 43), completed their diary. 75.6% wanted to proceed with surgery. All patients proceeding with surgery were happy with the remote assessment and would recommend this for the future.

Conclusion: It is possible to satisfactorily assess appropriately screened patients for BCHDs remotely with a structured approach and explanation of process and expectations. It might be possible to consider this type of consultation as an option for assessing potential candidates for BCHDs beyond the COVID-19 era to reduce the number of hospital visits for patients.

Keywords: Bone conduction implant; Hearing; Hearing loss; Patient-centred care; Telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Types of hearing loss

References

    1. ENT-UK (2020) Guidance for ENT during the COVID-19 pandemic [Internet]. 2020 [https://www.entuk.org/guidance-ent-during-covid-19-pandemic. Cited 16 Mar 2021
    1. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ [Internet] 2007;335(7624):806–808. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105(6):415–422. doi: 10.1177/000348949610500601. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dillon H, James A, Ginis J, et al. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 1997;8:27–43. - PubMed
    1. Faber HT, Kievit H, de Wolf MJF, Cremers CWRJ, Snik AFM, Hol MKS. Analysis of factors predicting the success of the bone conduction device headband trial in patients with single-sided deafness. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg (Internet) 2012;138(12):1129–1135. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.754. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types