Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;46(6):1345-1353.
doi: 10.1111/coa.13846. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

Patient perspectives on surveillance after head and neck cancer treatment: A systematic review

Oliver McLaren  1 , Clare Perkins  2 , Yinan Zhu  1 , Mary Smith  3 , Richard Williams  1
Affiliations

Patient perspectives on surveillance after head and neck cancer treatment: A systematic review

Oliver McLaren et al. Clin Otolaryngol. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: Current guidelines advise post-treatment surveillance of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients should involve scheduled appointments with a variety of practitioners. Increasing numbers of HNC survivors raise the burden to provide efficient and effective care. With resource limitation, there is growing importance to identify how surveillance can be justified and optimised for survivors. This systematic review presents current evidence on patient perspectives of post-treatment HNC surveillance, aiming to inform future work putting patient priorities at the forefront of surveillance planning.

Design: MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, NIHR Dissemination Centre, The Kings Fund Library, Clinical Evidence, NHS Evidence and NICE Clinical Evidence were searched to identify publications regarding patient perspectives of HNC post-treatment surveillance. Studies not reporting on both surveillance and patient perspectives were excluded.

Results: Three thousand five hundred fifty-eight citations were screened and 49 full-text articles reviewed. Sixteen studies were included in the final review. Three authors reviewed all articles prior to final analysis to ensure all met inclusion criteria. Most evidence was low quality. Study models returned included cross-sectional surveys, structured interviews and one systematic review. Overall, positive perceptions of HNC surveillance were mostly related to increased reassurance. Negative perceptions predominantly focused on anxiety and fear of recurrence, but a lack of psychological support and inadequate access to certain aspects of care were also reported.

Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrates that patients' perceptions of surveillance after HNC are mostly positive, feeling it provides reassurance. However, several studies report unmet needs, particularly regarding managing anxiety.

Keywords: follow-up care; neoplasms; survivorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferley J, Pisani P. Global Cancer Statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin [Internet]. 2005;55(2):74-108. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74
    1. Cancer Research UK, https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/s..., Accessed [September] [2020].
    1. Hewitt ME, Greenfield S, Stovall E. National Cancer Policy Board (U.S.). Committee on cancer survivorship: improving care and quality of life. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. National Academies Press; 2006.
    1. Joshi A, Calman F, O’Connell M, Jeannon J-P, Pracy P, Simo R. Current trends in the follow-up of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2010;22(2):114-118. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2009.11.004
    1. Kothari P, Trinidade A, Hewitt RJD, Singh A, O’Flynn P. The follow-up of patients with head and neck cancer: an analysis of 1,039 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2010;268(8):1191-1200. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1461-2

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources