Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2021 Oct;21(10):1348.
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00395-9. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

Is oropharyngeal sampling a reliable test to detect SARS-CoV-2?

Affiliations
Comment

Is oropharyngeal sampling a reliable test to detect SARS-CoV-2?

Tobias Todsen et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Oct.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interests.

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. Tsang NNY, So HC, Ng KY, Cowling BJ, Leung GM, Ip DKM. Diagnostic performance of different sampling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00146-8. published online April 12. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang X, Tan L, Wang X, et al. Comparison of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection in 353 patients received tests with both specimens simultaneously. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;94:107–109. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kinloch NN, Ritchie G, Brumme CJ, et al. Suboptimal biological sampling as a probable cause of false-negative COVID-19 diagnostic test results. J Infect Dis. 2020;222:899–902. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: Jan 25, 2021. COVID-19 clinical management: living guidance. Version WHO/2019-nCoV/clinical/2021.1.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-clinical-2021-1
    1. Todsen T, Tolsgaard M, Folke F, et al. SARS-CoV-2 in saliva, oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal specimens. Dan Med J. 2021;68 - PubMed