Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;226(2):255.e1-255.e7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.07.020. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

Outcomes associated with antibiotic administration for isolated maternal fever in labor

Affiliations

Outcomes associated with antibiotic administration for isolated maternal fever in labor

Tracy Caroline Bank et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists currently recommends that antibiotic treatment should be considered for women with isolated maternal fevers during labor. However, there is little known about the maternal and neonatal impact of antibiotic treatment in this scenario.

Objective: We sought to assess the outcomes in women with a nonsustained, isolated maternal fever treated with antibiotics and compare it with expectant management.

Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of laboring women with a singleton gestation at term and a single temperature of between 38.0°C and 38.9°C without other evidence of infection (leukocytosis >15,000/mm3, fetal tachycardia, malodorous amniotic fluid, suspected alternate source of infection) at a tertiary teaching hospital. A contemporaneously maintained, validated obstetrical database was used to identify women for our cohort. Women with rheumatologic or renal disease, nongestational diabetes, preterm labor, placental abruption, vaginal bleeding, HIV, malpresentation, and fetal anomalies were excluded. The primary outcome was a postpartum fever above 38.0°C. Secondary maternal outcomes were treatment for postpartum endometritis, uterine atony, postpartum hemorrhage, admission to the intensive care unit, and postpartum length of stay. Secondary neonatal outcomes were neonatal intensive care unit admission, 5-minute Apgar score of <7, 5-minute Apgar score of <4, neonatal intensive care unit length of stay, and neonatal antibiotic administration. The results were compared using univariable and multivariable analyses.

Results: From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018, 359 women were identified; 85 received antibiotics and 274 did not. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, except for gestational age at the time of delivery (39.2 weeks vs 39.5 weeks for the antibiotic and no antibiotic groups, respectively; P=.02). The incidence in postpartum fever showed a downward trend in the antibiotic group (10.59% for the antibiotic group vs 18.98% for the no antibiotic group; P=.07). Significantly fewer women in the antibiotic group were treated for postpartum endometritis (3.53% vs 11.31%; P=.03). Neonatal intensive care unit admission and neonatal antibiotic administration rates were higher in the antibiotic group (41.18% vs 17.88%; P<.001 and 36.47% vs 12.41%; P<.001, respectively). The incidence of 5-minute Apgar score of <7 was higher in the antibiotic group (8.25% vs 2.19%; P=.016). After controlling for age, gestational age, body mass index, group B streptococci status, delivery method, parity, administration of epidural, and receipt of acetaminophen, the odds for postpartum fever were reduced by a factor of 0.42 (95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.99) among women who received antibiotics when compared with those who did not receive antibiotics. Outcome results are presented in Table 2.

Conclusion: Although there was a lower rate of treatment for endometritis among women who received antibiotics for a single isolated maternal fever, there was a higher rate of neonatal intensive care unit admissions and 5-minute Apgar score of <7. This indicates that there likely is maternal benefit associated with antibiotic use, however, there are concerns about the neonatal risk.

Keywords: antibiotics; chorioamnionitis; fever; intraamniotic infection and inflammation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT Diagram. This is a CONSORT diagram illustrating the application of exclusion criteria used to arrive at the final population included in the study. Arrows indicate sequential exclusion criteria applied.

Comment in

References

    1. Rouse DJ, Landon M, Leveno KJ, et al. The maternal-fetal medicine units cesarean registry: chorioamnionitis at term and its duration—relationship to outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;191(1):211–216. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC, Hankins GD, Connor KD. Term maternal and neonatal complications of acute chorioamnionitis. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1985;66(1):59–62. - PubMed
    1. Jobe AH. Mechanisms of Lung Injury and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. American Journal of Perinatology. 2016;33(11):1076–1078. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1586107 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim CJ, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiyasit N, Yoon BH, Kim YM. Acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis: Definition, pathologic features, and clinical significance. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;213(4):S29–S52. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.040 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Higgins RD, Saade G, Polin RA, et al. Evaluation and Management of Women and Newborns With a Maternal Diagnosis of Chorioamnionitis. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016;127(3). doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001246 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances