Disparate Responses in Match Outcome across Competitive Surgical Subspecialties to Pandemic Era Constraints: An Analysis of Impacts of Minimal Auditions
- PMID: 34366285
- PMCID: PMC8713885
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.07.011
Disparate Responses in Match Outcome across Competitive Surgical Subspecialties to Pandemic Era Constraints: An Analysis of Impacts of Minimal Auditions
Abstract
Objective: The Covid-19 pandemic eliminated nearly all visiting sub-internships. We seek to uncover match rate disparities across plastic surgery, otolaryngology, urology, and neurosurgery subspecialties with respect to in-person appraisals. These data aim to highlight the common practices as well as subtle differences that each subspecialty may be displaying in selecting their respective residency candidates.
Design: We accessed publicly available online spreadsheets between March 24 to 27 specific to the following surgical subspecialties: plastic surgery, otolaryngology, neurosurgery, and urology. We collected available information including the matched applicants' medical school, the institution at which they matched, and whether they had previous communication with their matched program. This data was then used to record whether the applicant matched at their home institution.
Setting: N/A PARTICIPANTS: N/A RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in the number of plastic surgery and otolaryngology applicants who matched at their home programs during the 2020 to 2021 application cycle. 12.1% and 17.2% of plastic surgery applicants matched at their home program in the 2018 to 2019 and 2019 to 2020 application cycles, compared to 25.0% during the 2020 to 2021 application cycle (p = 0.0345). Overall, 23.4% and 22.2% of otolaryngology applicants matched at their home program in the 2018 to 2019 and 2019 to 2020 application cycles, compared to 31.3% during the 2020 to 2021 application cycle (p = 0.0482). Neurosurgery and urology applicants did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in home match rates during the 2020 to 2021 application cycle (p = 0.164 and p = 0.105, respectively).
Conclusions: Covid-19 related restrictions in the 2020 to 2021 match cycle led residency programs to utilize novel selection mechanisms to evaluate applicants. Without visiting sub-internships during the 2020 to 2021 match cycle, some programs appear to have intentionally favored candidates with whom they were previously acquainted. The significantly higher number of international medical graduates and non-senior medical graduates among neurosurgery and urology residencies, respectively, likely washed out the home matching effect among these specialties but does not discount the importance of in-person appraisals.
Keywords: Covid-19; away rotations; home program; match; residency; visiting sub-internships.
Copyright © 2021 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The Impact of COVID-19 on Plastic Surgery Home Program Match Rates.Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Jan 1;88(1):4-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002981. Ann Plast Surg. 2022. PMID: 34393193
-
Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic.J Surg Educ. 2021 Nov-Dec;78(6):1923-1929. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jun 12. J Surg Educ. 2021. PMID: 34210645 Free PMC article.
-
Geographic Trends in the Neurosurgery Match During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Neurosurgery. 2023 May 1;92(5):e104-e110. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002302. Epub 2023 Jan 6. Neurosurgery. 2023. PMID: 36705514
-
Program Signaling and Geographic Preferences in the United States Residency Match for Neurosurgery.Cureus. 2024 Sep 20;16(9):e69780. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69780. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39429415 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Publication Volume and Equity in Competitive Surgical Residency Programs: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 2023-2024 Match.Cureus. 2025 Apr 17;17(4):e82451. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82451. eCollection 2025 Apr. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40385844 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
COVID-19 and the Otolaryngology Match: An Increase in Applicants Remaining Close to Home.Cureus. 2022 Mar 30;14(3):e23650. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23650. eCollection 2022 Mar. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35505731 Free PMC article.
-
The pathway to residency in Germany: a survey study to identify factors that impact an international medical graduate from Syria.BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 1;22(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03582-6. BMC Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 35778733 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of COVID-19 on the Ophthalmology Residency Home-Institution Match Rate.J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2022 Jul 27;14(2):e166-e168. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750022. eCollection 2022 Jul. J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2022. PMID: 37388174 Free PMC article.
-
A SWOT Analysis of Urology Residency.Curr Urol Rep. 2021 Dec 16;22(12):61. doi: 10.1007/s11934-021-01080-8. Curr Urol Rep. 2021. PMID: 34913100 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Abraham J.T., Nguyen A.V., Weber R.A. Integrated plastic surgery residency applicant trends and comparison with other surgical specialties. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80:164–170. - PubMed
-
- Liang F., Rudnicki P.A., Prince N.H., et al. An evaluation of plastic surgery resident selection factors. J Surg Educ. 2015;72:8–15. - PubMed
-
- Qiu C., Girard A., Lopez C.D., et al. Plastic surgery subinternships: current perspectives and future considerations. J Surg Educ. 2021;78(3):733–736. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical