Valid for who? A preliminary investigation of the validity of two sexual victimization questionnaires in men and sexual minorities
- PMID: 34366644
- PMCID: PMC8341384
- DOI: 10.1007/s12103-020-09589-3
Valid for who? A preliminary investigation of the validity of two sexual victimization questionnaires in men and sexual minorities
Abstract
The #MeToo movement illuminated vast numbers of people who experienced sexual violence, but the exact scope and impact, especially among under-studied populations (e.g., men and sexual minorities) is unclear, due in part to measurement issues. Our objective was to compare the validity of two measures of sexual violence victimization: The Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Victimization (SES-SFV) and The Post-Refusal Sexual Persistence Scale - Victimization (PRSPS-V). Participants were 673 college students who first completed the Rape Empathy for Victims (REM-V) and then the SES-SFV and PRSPS-V (counter-balanced). We found strong evidence of convergent validity for the PRSPS-V with correlations ranging from r = .57 - 88. Convergent validity correlations were strongest for sexual minority women (r = .88) and weakest for heterosexual men (r = .57). We also found evidence of differential validity for the SES-SFV and PRSPS-V. For heterosexual women, rape empathy was correlated to victimization on both questionnaires (r = .25 - .29). However, for heterosexual men, only scores on the SES-SFV were correlated with rape empathy for victims (r = .19). For sexual minorities there appeared to be differences between PRSPS-V only victims and those who reported victimization on both questionnaires in rape empathy (F = 2.65, p = .053). These results provide researchers a starting point for improving these questionnaires to collect more accurate data that helps improve the ability to detect cases of sexual victimization and thus, prevent and heal sexual victimization, especially in understudied populations such as men and sexual minorities.
Keywords: Rape; assessment; health disparities; measurement; sexual assault; sexual minority.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Participant Acceptability of Questionnaires Impacts Sexual Victimization Prevalence Rates.J Child Sex Abus. 2023 Jul-Dec;32(6):771-789. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2023.2240778. Epub 2023 Aug 2. J Child Sex Abus. 2023. PMID: 37533189 Free PMC article.
-
Discrepant Responding across Measures of College Students' Sexual Victimization Experiences: Conceptual Replication and Extension.J Sex Res. 2020 May-Jun;57(5):585-596. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1669135. Epub 2019 Sep 25. J Sex Res. 2020. PMID: 31553252 Free PMC article.
-
Preliminary Evidence of Validity for the Verbally Pressured and Illegal Sexual Exploitation Modules of the Sexual Experiences Survey-Victimization.J Sex Res. 2024 Jul;61(6):922-935. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2362264. Epub 2024 Jul 7. J Sex Res. 2024. PMID: 38973058
-
Campus Sexual Assault: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Research From 2000 to 2015.Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018 Jan;19(1):76-93. doi: 10.1177/1524838016631129. Epub 2016 Feb 22. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018. PMID: 26906086
-
Big Boys Don't Cry: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Male Sexual Victimization.Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020 Dec;21(5):991-1010. doi: 10.1177/1524838018816979. Epub 2018 Dec 16. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020. PMID: 30554559 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Quantifying Criminal Sexual Acts: The Illegal Sexual Exploitation Module of the Revised Sexual Experiences Survey-Victimization (SES-V) Measure.J Sex Res. 2024 Jul;61(6):868-881. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2359049. Epub 2024 Jul 7. J Sex Res. 2024. PMID: 38973057 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Participant Acceptability of Questionnaires Impacts Sexual Victimization Prevalence Rates.J Child Sex Abus. 2023 Jul-Dec;32(6):771-789. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2023.2240778. Epub 2023 Aug 2. J Child Sex Abus. 2023. PMID: 37533189 Free PMC article.
-
An Experimental Test of the Impact of Varying Questionnaire Response Format on Prevalence Rates for Sexual Violence Victimization and Perpetration.J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP23541-NP23562. doi: 10.1177/08862605211064239. Epub 2021 Dec 24. J Interpers Violence. 2022. PMID: 34951324 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond Force, Incapacitation, or Verbal Coercion: Rates and Outcomes of Sexual Assault without Warning.J Sex Res. 2024 Sep 19:1-10. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2403019. Online ahead of print. J Sex Res. 2024. PMID: 39297496
-
Between "You" and "Me": Effects of Pronouns and Order on Disclosing Sexual Assault.J Sex Res. 2025 Feb;62(2):276-289. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2341426. Epub 2024 Apr 17. J Sex Res. 2025. PMID: 38629699
References
-
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
-
- Anderson RE, Cahill SP, & Delahanty DL (2018a). The psychometric properties of the Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Victimization (SES-SFV) and characteristics of sexual victimization experiences in college men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 19, 25–34. doi:10.1037/men0000073 - DOI
-
- Anderson RE, Cahill SP, & Delahanty DL (2018b). Discordance between the Sexual Experiences Surveys—Short Forms and the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales in college men. Psychology of Violence. doi:10.1037/vio0000199 - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources