Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;46(1):168-185.
doi: 10.1007/s12103-020-09589-3. Epub 2021 Jan 9.

Valid for who? A preliminary investigation of the validity of two sexual victimization questionnaires in men and sexual minorities

Affiliations

Valid for who? A preliminary investigation of the validity of two sexual victimization questionnaires in men and sexual minorities

RaeAnn E Anderson et al. Am J Crim Justice. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

The #MeToo movement illuminated vast numbers of people who experienced sexual violence, but the exact scope and impact, especially among under-studied populations (e.g., men and sexual minorities) is unclear, due in part to measurement issues. Our objective was to compare the validity of two measures of sexual violence victimization: The Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Victimization (SES-SFV) and The Post-Refusal Sexual Persistence Scale - Victimization (PRSPS-V). Participants were 673 college students who first completed the Rape Empathy for Victims (REM-V) and then the SES-SFV and PRSPS-V (counter-balanced). We found strong evidence of convergent validity for the PRSPS-V with correlations ranging from r = .57 - 88. Convergent validity correlations were strongest for sexual minority women (r = .88) and weakest for heterosexual men (r = .57). We also found evidence of differential validity for the SES-SFV and PRSPS-V. For heterosexual women, rape empathy was correlated to victimization on both questionnaires (r = .25 - .29). However, for heterosexual men, only scores on the SES-SFV were correlated with rape empathy for victims (r = .19). For sexual minorities there appeared to be differences between PRSPS-V only victims and those who reported victimization on both questionnaires in rape empathy (F = 2.65, p = .053). These results provide researchers a starting point for improving these questionnaires to collect more accurate data that helps improve the ability to detect cases of sexual victimization and thus, prevent and heal sexual victimization, especially in understudied populations such as men and sexual minorities.

Keywords: Rape; assessment; health disparities; measurement; sexual assault; sexual minority.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Note. The possible range of scores is 23–105, the range was truncated for ease of interpretation. SES-SFV = Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Victimization, PRSPS-V = Post-Refusal Sexual Persistence Scale-Victimization

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
    1. Anderson RE, & Delahanty DL (2019). Discrepant responding across measures of college students’ sexual victimization experiences: Conceptual replication and extension. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–12. 10.1080/00224499.2019.1669135 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson RE, Cahill SP, & Delahanty DL (2018a). The psychometric properties of the Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Victimization (SES-SFV) and characteristics of sexual victimization experiences in college men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 19, 25–34. doi:10.1037/men0000073 - DOI
    1. Anderson RE, Cahill SP, & Delahanty DL (2018b). Discordance between the Sexual Experiences Surveys—Short Forms and the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales in college men. Psychology of Violence. doi:10.1037/vio0000199 - DOI
    1. Anderson RE, Goodman EL, & Thimm SS (2020). The Assessment of Forced Penetration: A Necessary and Further Step Toward Understanding Men’s Sexual Victimization and Women’s Perpetration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 104398622093610. 10.1177/1043986220936108 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources