Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 21:12:628548.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.628548. eCollection 2021.

Switching and Discontinuation Pattern of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Tofacitinib for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Taiwan

Affiliations

Switching and Discontinuation Pattern of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Tofacitinib for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Taiwan

Ko-Jen Li et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory systemic disease characterized by persistent joint synovial inflammation and swelling, leading to cartilage damage and bone erosion. This retrospective, longitudinal study is to evaluate the treatment patterns of biologic-naïve RA patients receiving index biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) and tofacitinib by the data of Taiwan National Healthcare Insurance Claims and the Death Registry between 2012 and 2017. Drug survival and treatment patterns were determined by investigating the occurrence of switching and discontinuation from index treatment. At baseline, 70.0% of patients used tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) bDMARD with the majority taking etanercept (27.0%) or adalimumab (26.2%). During the follow-up period, 40.0% (n = 3,464) of index users switched (n = 1,479) or discontinued (n = 1,985) the treatment with an average incidence rate of 0.18 per patient-year. Among the six index treatment groups, drug survival was the lowest for adalimumab and highest for tocilizumab. When compared with etanercept, only adalimumab had a higher cumulative probability of switching/discontinuation (adjusted HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08-1.28), whereas golimumab, non-TNFi bDMARDs and tofacitinib were significantly less probable to switch or discontinue. For patients switching the index treatment, tocilizumab (31.2%) and tofacitinib (23.4%) were the main regimens being switched to. In addition, 48.2% of patients who discontinued the index treatment received further retreatment, and 63.8-77.0% of them were retreated with same agent. In conclusion, this population-based study found that TNFi were the preferred agents as the index treatments during 2012-2017. Non-TNFi and tofacitinib were more common second-line agents being switched to. Nearly half of discontinued patients received retreatment, with a majority receiving the same agent.

Keywords: biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; rheumatoid arthritis; tofacitinib; treatment pattern; tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

K-JL has received speaker fees from Pfizer, Abbvie, Roche, Lilly, Janssen, Chugai, and Novartis (less than $10,000 each). C-YH is an employee of Pfizer. No other disclosures relevant to this article were reported. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart of patient selection. Abbreviation: ER, emergency room; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; TB, tuberculosis.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Trend of index treatment, 2012–2017.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Drug survival by index treatment (Log-rank test, p < 0.0001).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) with 95% confidence interval of the effects of index treatment on the cumulative probability of switching/discontinuation in the Cox proportional regression analysis with etanercept set as the reference group. aAdjusted for age at index, gender; CCI, comorbidities; use of MTX, use of other csDMARDs other than MTX, and use of steroid.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bonafede M. M. K., McMorrow D., Proudfoot C., Shinde S., Kuznik A., Chen C. I. (2018). Treatment Persistence and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis after a Change in Targeted Therapy. Am. Health Drug Benefits 11 (4), 192–202. 30464787 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bureau of National Health Insuarance (2013). Provision of the Coverage and Reimbursement Policies/Criteria for Immunologic Agents [Chinese]. Available from: https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=2A21BF7EBFA32789=5FE8C9FEAE86....
    1. Cannon G. W., DuVall S. L., Haroldsen C. L., Caplan L., Curtis J. R., Michaud K., et al. (2016). Clinical Outcomes and Biologic Costs of Switching between Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in US Veterans with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Adv. Ther. 33 (8), 1347–1359. 10.1007/s12325-016-0371-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caporali R., Zavaglia D. (2019). Real-world Experience with Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 37 (3), 485–495. 30183607 - PubMed
    1. Desai R. J., Solomon D. H., Jin Y., Liu J., Kim S. C. (2017). Temporal Trends in Use of Biologic DMARDs for Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United States: A Cohort Study of Publicly and Privately Insured Patients. Jmcp 23 (8), 809–814. 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.8.809 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources