Having the Cake and Eating It Too: First-Order, Second-Order and Bifactor Representations of Work Engagement
- PMID: 34366951
- PMCID: PMC8339798
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615581
Having the Cake and Eating It Too: First-Order, Second-Order and Bifactor Representations of Work Engagement
Abstract
Even though work engagement is a popular construct in organizational psychology, the question remains whether it is experienced as a global construct, or as its three components (vigor, dedication, absorption). The present study thus contributes to the ongoing scientific debate about the dimensionality of work engagement systematically compared one-factor, first-order, higher-order, and bifactor confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) representations of work engagement measured by the short version of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9). We also documented the validity evidence of the most optimal representation based on its test-criterion relationship with basic psychological need fulfillment at work, turnover intentions, work addiction, and work satisfaction. Based on responses provided by two distinct samples of employees (N 1 = 242, N 2 = 505), our results supported the superiority of the bifactor-CFA representation including a global factor of work engagement and three co-existing specific factors of vigor, dedication, and absorption. This representation replicated well across the two samples through tests of measurement invariance. Finally, while global work engagement was substantially related to all correlates, the specific factors also demonstrated meaningful associations over and above the global levels of work engagement.
Keywords: basic psychological needs; bifactor-CFA; validity evidence based on test-criterion relationship; work addiction; work engagement; work satisfaction.
Copyright © 2021 Salamon, Tóth-Király, Bõthe, Nagy and Orosz.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a standard measurement tool - A literature review.Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017 Mar 30;30(2):161-175. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00947. Epub 2017 Feb 17. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017. PMID: 28366949 Review.
-
Work Engagement in Serbia: Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES).Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 16;8:1799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01799. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 29085319 Free PMC article.
-
One, two or three dimensions of work engagement? Testing the factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale on a sample of Polish employees.Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019 Jun;25(2):241-249. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1371958. Epub 2017 Oct 11. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019. PMID: 28849984
-
[Measuring the positive dimensions among health care workers: a contribution to the Italian validation of the UWES--Utrecht Work Engagement Scale].G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2008 Jan-Mar;30(1 Suppl A):A111-9. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2008. PMID: 18700486 Italian.
-
A Comparison of Three Job Engagement Measures: Examining their Factorial and Criterion-Related Validity.Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2012 Mar;4(1):67-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01059.x. Epub 2011 Oct 27. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2012. PMID: 26286971
References
-
- Adie J. W., Duda J. L., Ntoumanis N. (2008). Autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the optimal functioning of adult male and female sport participants: a test of basic needs theory. Motiv. Emot. 32 189–199. 10.1007/s11031-008-9095-z - DOI
-
- Alessandri G., Borgogni L., Schaufeli W. B., Caprara G. V., Consiglio C. (2015). From positive orientation to job performance: the role of work engagement and self-efficacy beliefs. J. Happiness Stud. 16 767–788. 10.1007/s10902-014-9533-4 - DOI
-
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, USA: American Educational Research Association.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources