Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 22:12:615581.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615581. eCollection 2021.

Having the Cake and Eating It Too: First-Order, Second-Order and Bifactor Representations of Work Engagement

Affiliations

Having the Cake and Eating It Too: First-Order, Second-Order and Bifactor Representations of Work Engagement

Janos Salamon et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Even though work engagement is a popular construct in organizational psychology, the question remains whether it is experienced as a global construct, or as its three components (vigor, dedication, absorption). The present study thus contributes to the ongoing scientific debate about the dimensionality of work engagement systematically compared one-factor, first-order, higher-order, and bifactor confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) representations of work engagement measured by the short version of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9). We also documented the validity evidence of the most optimal representation based on its test-criterion relationship with basic psychological need fulfillment at work, turnover intentions, work addiction, and work satisfaction. Based on responses provided by two distinct samples of employees (N 1 = 242, N 2 = 505), our results supported the superiority of the bifactor-CFA representation including a global factor of work engagement and three co-existing specific factors of vigor, dedication, and absorption. This representation replicated well across the two samples through tests of measurement invariance. Finally, while global work engagement was substantially related to all correlates, the specific factors also demonstrated meaningful associations over and above the global levels of work engagement.

Keywords: basic psychological needs; bifactor-CFA; validity evidence based on test-criterion relationship; work addiction; work engagement; work satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic representation of the estimated model for work engagement. Note. CFA, confirmatory factor analysis; i1-i9, item 1-9; VI, vigor; DE, dedication; AB, absorption; WE, work engagement. Unidirectional arrows represent factor loadings, bidirectional arrows represent correlations.

Similar articles

References

    1. Adie J. W., Duda J. L., Ntoumanis N. (2008). Autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the optimal functioning of adult male and female sport participants: a test of basic needs theory. Motiv. Emot. 32 189–199. 10.1007/s11031-008-9095-z - DOI
    1. Alessandri G., Borgogni L., Schaufeli W. B., Caprara G. V., Consiglio C. (2015). From positive orientation to job performance: the role of work engagement and self-efficacy beliefs. J. Happiness Stud. 16 767–788. 10.1007/s10902-014-9533-4 - DOI
    1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, USA: American Educational Research Association.
    1. Andreassen C. S., Griffiths M. D., Hetland J., Pallesen S. (2012). Development of a work addiction scale: development of a work addiction scale. Scand. J. Psychol. 53 265–272. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00947.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andreassen C. S., Griffiths M. D., Sinha R., Hetland J., Pallesen S. (2016). The relationships between workaholism and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a large-scale cross-sectional study. PLoS One 11:e0152978. 10.1371/journal.pone.0152978 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources