Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 21:12:702841.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.702841. eCollection 2021.

Maize Responses Challenged by Drought, Elevated Daytime Temperature and Arthropod Herbivory Stresses: A Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular View

Affiliations
Review

Maize Responses Challenged by Drought, Elevated Daytime Temperature and Arthropod Herbivory Stresses: A Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular View

Cristhian Camilo Chávez-Arias et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the main cereals grown around the world. It is used for human and animal nutrition and also as biofuel. However, as a direct consequence of global climate change, increased abiotic and biotic stress events have been reported in different regions of the world, which have become a threat to world maize yields. Drought and heat are environmental stresses that influence the growth, development, and yield processes of maize crops. Plants have developed dynamic responses at the physiological, biochemical, and molecular levels that allow them to escape, avoid and/or tolerate unfavorable environmental conditions. Arthropod herbivory can generate resistance or tolerance responses in plants that are associated with inducible and constitutive defenses. Increases in the frequency and severity of abiotic stress events (drought and heat), as a consequence of climate change, can generate critical variations in plant-insect interactions. However, the behavior of herbivorous arthropods under drought scenarios is not well understood, and this kind of stress may have some positive and negative effects on arthropod populations. The simultaneous appearance of different environmental stresses and biotic factors results in very complex plant responses. In this review, recent information is provided on the physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses of plants to the combination of drought, heat stress, and the effect on some arthropod pests of interest in the maize crop.

Keywords: Zea mays L; climate change; drought; herbivorous arthropods; high temperature; stress combination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Mechanisms of morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses to the combination of drought and heat in maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Adapted from Aslam et al. (2015) and Tiwari and Yadav (2019). Words in italics represent physiological, biochemical and molecular plant mechanisms, non-italicized words represent biological processes affected by abiotic stresses.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Concept model of the morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses of maize plants (Zea mays L.) to the impact of the combination of drought, heat stress, and arthropod herbivory. PN, net photosynthesis rate; gs, stomatal conductance; E, plant transpiration; TChl, total chlorophyll content; Fv/Fm, maximum quantum efficiency of PSII; NPQ, non-photochemical quenching; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; LEA, late embryogenesis abundant proteins; HSPs, heat shock proteins; and RWC, relative water content. Dotted arrows highlight responses and tolerance mechanisms of plants to single (drought, heat, or herbivory arthropod) or combined stresses. Blue or red arrows represent increase or decrease of plant responses at physiological, biochemical and molecular levels, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Afzal Z., Howton T. C., Sun Y., Mukhtar M. S. (2016). The roles of aquaporins in plant stress responses. J. Dev. Biol. 4:9. 10.3390/jdb4010009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmad B., Raina A., Khan S. (2019). “Impact of biotic and abiotic stresses on plants, and their responses,” in Disease Resistance in Crop Plants, ed. Wani S. (Cham: Springer; ), 1–20. 10.1007/978-3-030-20728-1_1 - DOI
    1. Ai Y., Jane J. L. (2016). Macronutrients in corn and human nutrition. Comp. Rev. Food Sci. F 15 581–598. 10.1111/1541-4337.12192 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ainsworth E. A. (2008). Rice production in a changing climate: a meta-analysis of responses to elevated carbon dioxide and elevated ozone concentration. Glob. Change Biol. 14 1642–1650. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01594.x - DOI
    1. Alhaithloul H. A. S. (2019). Impact of combined heat and drought stress on the potential growth responses of the desert grass artemisia sieberi alba: relation to biochemical and molecular adaptation. Plants 8:416. 10.3390/plants8100416 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources