Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul:17:859-866.
doi: 10.1038/s41567-021-01215-1. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

Embryonic Tissues as Active Foams

Affiliations

Embryonic Tissues as Active Foams

Sangwoo Kim et al. Nat Phys. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

The physical state of embryonic tissues emerges from non-equilibrium, collective interactions among constituent cells. Cellular jamming, rigidity transitions and characteristics of glassy dynamics have all been observed in multicellular systems, but it is unclear how cells control these emergent tissue states and transitions, including tissue fluidization. Combining computational and experimental methods, here we show that tissue fluidization in posterior zebrafish tissues is controlled by the stochastic dynamics of tensions at cell-cell contacts. We develop a computational framework that connects cell behavior to embryonic tissue dynamics, accounting for the presence of extracellular spaces, complex cell shapes and cortical tension dynamics. We predict that tissues are maximally rigid at the structural transition between confluent and non-confluent states, with actively-generated tension fluctuations controlling stress relaxation and tissue fluidization. By directly measuring strain and stress relaxation, as well as the dynamics of cell rearrangements, in elongating posterior zebrafish tissues, we show that tension fluctuations drive active cell rearrangements that fluidize the tissue. These results highlight a key role of non-equilibrium tension dynamics in developmental processes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Figures

Extended Data Fig. 1
Extended Data Fig. 1. Power law relation between NE rate and MSD at long timescales
Power law relation between long time MSD values and NE rate when the systems are close to confluence for high adhesion levels. NE rate and longtime MSD show a power law relation with an exponent of 0.75.
Extended Data Fig. 2
Extended Data Fig. 2. Comparison of solid/fluid phase diagrams obtained from stress relaxation and from cell movements
Solid/fluid phase diagrams determined by mechanical measurement of stress relaxation (left) and cell movements, MSD=1/2 (middle) and MSD=1/4 (right). Green region indicates confluent states.
Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Characteristics of multicellular systems and simulation framework.
a, Confocal section of embryonic tissue in a zebrafish embryo (membranes labeled; yellow). b, Schematics of cortical tension and adhesion at cell-cell contacts in a multicellular system with spaces (red) between cells (gray). c, Confocal section through zebrafish embryonic tissues showing the intensity (Is) of fluorescent reporter protein secreted extracellularly as well as cell membranes (green), indicating the presence of extracellular spaces (red range). d, Schematics defining the cell size L0, cell number N and simulation box area AT, which specify cell density. e, Kymograph of membrane signal intensity (I) along a tissue region (pink; left panel) containing a cell-cell contact, showing contact length fluctuations (bottom). f, Simulated tension fluctuations causing cell-cell contact length fluctuations. Increasing (decreasing) tension shortens (lengthens) cell-cell junctions (bottom). g, Schematics of the dynamic vertex model formulation. Triple vertices (physical vertices; red) and non-physical intermediate vertices (blue) are shown.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Equilibrium configurations and structural transitions.
a-c, Representative equilibrium configurations (a), volume fraction ϕ (b) and mean number of neighbors z (c) for varying values of relative adhesion W/T0 and cell density ρ. d, number NE (top) and average area ĀE (bottom) of extracellular spaces for varying relative cell adhesion and different cell densities, showing a sharp structural transition at W/T0 ≈ 0.23 (gray line) leading to the opening of large extracellular spaces. e, Lowering (dashed line) and increasing (dash-dotted line) relative adhesion quasi-statically shows bistable states and strong hysteresis in equilibrium configurations. Equilibrium quenched states are also shown (solid line). f, Average neighbor number (cell contacts) z as the system volume fraction changes at vanishing cell adhesion, showing the existence of a jamming transition at ϕc ≃ 0.83 (configuration shown in inset). Power law fits zzc = z0(ϕϕc)1/2 + z1(ϕϕc) with non-zero z0 and z1 (red line) and with z1 = 0 (gray line) are shown. g, Average shape factor for varying relative adhesion showing a sharp increase at W/T0 = 2 (vanishing tensions), leading to anisotropic cell shapes (inset), recapitulating density-independent transitions. h, Schematics of a simple shear deformation imposing a large strain step (ϵxy = 1.5), with associated temporal evolution of both strain and shear stress. i, Temporal relaxation of shear stress σxy (normalized to σ0ρT0L0) after the imposed strain step for varying adhesion levels. j-k, Dependence of the yield stress σY on the relative adhesion strength (j) and on both cell density and relative adhesion (k), showing a maximum at the structural transition between confluent and non-confluent states (green line). Error bands = SD. N= 20 (b,c,d,f,g) and N=10 (e,i,j,k) independent simulations for each parameter set.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. Tissue dynamics with finite tension fluctuations.
a, MSD for varying magnitudes of tension fluctuations ΔT/T0, showing sub-diffusive (0 < α < 1) and diffusive (α = 1) behaviors as tension fluctuation increase (inset). b, Snapshots of dynamic configurations with examples of cell trajectories over t/τT = 102. c, MSD at long timescales (t = 102τTτT > τR), showing non-monotonous behavior for varying relative adhesion strength and minimal values at the structural transition. d, Cellular neighbor exchange (NE) rate for varying relative adhesion. Distinct types of neighbor exchange events: gain/loss of cell contacts (left) and T1 transitions (right). Error bands = SD. 10 independent simulations for each set of parameters.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:. Stress relaxation and structure in active multicellular systems.
a-b, Stress relaxation (a) and temporal changes in cellular NE rate (b) after the imposed strain step for varying magnitudes of tension fluctuations. The long timescale stress relaxation follows stretched exponentials (black dashed lines) and eventually reaches the average value σA of active shear stress fluctuations (horizontal lines in inset). The cellular NE rate quickly decays to zero in the absence of activity (t ~ τR), but remains finite in the presence of activity. c, Sketch showing the dynamics NE induced by the externally applied shear strain (passive) and by tension fluctuations in cells (active). Active NE enables further stress relaxation and tissue fluidization after the initial passively induced NE. d, Stress relaxation timescale τSR for varying magnitude of tension fluctuations and relative adhesion, showing a sharp increase as the structural transition between non-confluent and confluent (green background) states. e, Phase diagram showing the transition between fluid and solid tissue states for different activity values and relative adhesion strength. Solid states surround the structural transition and are found both in confluent and non-confluent configurations for low enough activity. f-h, Dependence of the system volume fraction ϕ (f) and average shape factor s (g; with red/blue squares indicating fluid/solid states, respectively) on relative adhesion for different magnitudes of tension fluctuations. Representative snapshots of dynamic configurations for fixed relative adhesion (W/T0 = 1; vertical dashed line in g) and increasing tension fluctuations are shown (h), with red/blue contours indicating fluid/solid states, respectively. Error bands = SD. 10 independent simulations for each set of parameters.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:. Stress relaxation and tissue fluidization in posterior tissues during body axis elongation.
a, Lateral view of a zebrafish embryo and sketches showing lateral and dorsal views of posterior tissues, indicating the fluid-like MPZ and solid-like PSM. A confocal section showing a portion of the MPZ (cell membranes, yellow) with a magnetic droplet (magenta) is highlighted. b, Schematic sketches and confocal snapshots of magnetic droplet actuation in the MPZ tissue. c, Time evolution of the strain, (b – b0)/R, before, during and after magnetic actuation. d, Relaxation of anisotropic stress σA(t) after magnetic actuation in both linear and log-linear scales, with σA0=σA(t=0). The fit (black line) corresponds to a stretched-exponential function. e, Example of NE events. f, Normalized frequency of amplitude of junctional length fluctuations for the MPZ, both in the absence and presence of blebbistatin (average amplitudes in inset). g, Cumulative NE events in the MPZ (away from the droplet, cyan) and in the close neighborhood of the droplet (around droplet, red). h, Temporal evolution of NE rate in the MPZ (cyan) and also in the region around droplet (red). i, Average NE rates in the region around droplet (A.D., both during initial droplet relaxation (green) and at its final stages (pink)) and in the MPZ, both in the absence (cyan) and presence (orange) of blebbistatin. j, Experimentally measured and simulated dynamics of cell shapes in both MPZ and PSM, showing faster dynamics in the MPZ and largely static cell boundaries in the PSM. Experimental data is an average intensity projection of a confocal section timelapse. k, MSRD shows uncaging behavior for the MPZ but caged for the PSM of both wild type and cdh2−/− embryos. Error Band=SD (d,g), SEM (i,k). N=10 (d), N=298 from 4 embryos (g,h,i; A.D), N=396 from 3 embryos (g,h,i; MPZ). Data in f, MPZ bleb in i and MRSD for MPZ and PSM in wild type embryos in k were reanalyzed from Ref. .

References

    1. Heisenberg C-P & Bellaiche Y Forces in Tissue Morphogenesis and Patterning. Cell 153, 948–962 (2013). - PubMed
    1. Guillot C & Lecuit T Mechanics of Epithelial Tissue Homeostasis and Morphogenesis. Science (New York, NY) 340, 1185–1189 (2013). - PubMed
    1. Angelini TE et al. Glass-like dynamics of collective cell migration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (2011). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malinverno C et al. Endocytic reawakening of motility in jammed epithelia. Nature Materials 16, 587–596 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park J-A et al. Unjamming and cell shape in the asthmatic airway epithelium. Nature materials 14, 1040 (2015). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources