Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 24;5(1):e129.
doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.793. eCollection 2021.

Impact of a statewide computed tomography scan educational campaign on radiation dose and repeat CT scan rates for transferred injured children

Rosemary Nabaweesi  1   2 , Chary Akmyradov  3 , Mary E Aitken  1   2 , Phillip J Kenney  4 , Raghu H Ramakrishnaiah  5
Affiliations

Impact of a statewide computed tomography scan educational campaign on radiation dose and repeat CT scan rates for transferred injured children

Rosemary Nabaweesi et al. J Clin Transl Sci. .

Abstract

Purpose: Research demonstrates that children receive twice as much medical radiation from Computed Tomography (CT) scans performed at non-pediatric facilities as equivalent CTs performed at pediatric trauma centers (PTCs). In 2014, AFMC outreach staff educated Emergency Department (ED) staff on appropriate CT imaging utilization to reduce unnecessary medical radiation exposure. We set out to determine the educational campaign's impact on injured children received radiation dose.

Methods: All injured children who underwent CT imaging and were transferred to a Level I PTC during 2010 to 2013 (pre-campaign) and 2015 (post-campaign) were reviewed. Patient demographics, mode of transportation, ED length of stay, scanned body region, injury severity score, and trauma center level were analyzed. Median effective radiation dose (ERD) controlled for each variable, pre-campaign and post-campaign, was compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results: Three hundred eighty-five children under 17 years were transferred from 45 and 48 hospitals, pre- and post-campaign. Most (43%) transferring hospitals were urban or critical access hospitals (30%). Pre- and post-campaign patient demographics were similar. We analyzed 482 and 398 CT scans pre- and post-campaign. Overall, median ERD significantly decreased from 3.80 to 2.80. Abdominal CT scan ERD declined significantly from 7.2 to 4.13 (P-value 0.03). Head CT scan ERD declined from 3.27 to 2.45 (P-value < 0.0001).

Conclusion: A statewide, CT scan educational campaign contributed to ERD decline (lower dose scans and fewer repeat scans) among transferred injured children seen at PTCs. State-level interventions are feasible and can be effective in changing radiology provider practices.

Keywords: Pediatric computed tomography scan protocols; educational campaign; evaluation; radiation dose; radiation safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Data flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Mettler FA Jr., Wiest PW, Locken JA, Kelsey CA. CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. Journal of Radiological Protection 2000; 20(4): 353–359. - PubMed
    1. Wiest PW, Locken JA, Heintz PH, Mettler FA Jr. CT scanning: a major source of radiation exposure. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2002; 23(5): 402–410. - PubMed
    1. Fernandes K, Levin TL, Miller T, Schoenfeld AH, Amis ES Jr. Evaluating an image gently and image wisely campaign in a multihospital health care system. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2016; 13(8): 1010–1017. - PubMed
    1. Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. American Journal of Roentgenology 2009; 192(4): 887–892. - PubMed
    1. Schauer DA, Linton OW. NCRP Report No. 160, Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States, medical exposure – are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists? Health Physics 2009; 97(1): 1–5. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources