Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 24;5(1):e130.
doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.794. eCollection 2021.

Assessing the application of human-centered design to translational research

Marie K Norman  1   2 , Megan E Hamm  3 , Yael Schenker  4 , Colleen A Mayowski  1   2 , William Hierholzer  2 , Doris M Rubio  1   2 , Steven E Reis  2
Affiliations

Assessing the application of human-centered design to translational research

Marie K Norman et al. J Clin Transl Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: Human-centered design (HCD) training offers the potential to improve both team processes and products. However, the use of HCD to improve the quality of team science is a relatively recent application, and its benefits and challenges have not been rigorously evaluated. We conducted a qualitative study with health sciences researchers trained in HCD methods. We aimed to determine how researchers applied HCD methods and perceived the benefits and barriers to using HCD on research teams.

Methods: We conducted 1-hour, semi-structured interviews with trainees from three training cohorts. Interviews focused on perceptions of the training, subsequent uses of HCD, barriers and facilitators, and perceptions of the utility of HCD to science teams. Data analysis was conducted using Braun and Clarke's process for thematic analysis.

Results: We interviewed nine faculty and nine staff trained in HCD methods and identified four themes encompassing HCD use, benefits, challenges, and tensions between HCD approaches and academic culture.

Conclusions: Trainees found HCD relevant to research teams for stakeholder engagement, research design, project planning, meeting facilitation, and team management. They also described benefits of HCD in five distinct areas: creativity, egalitarianism, structure, efficiency, and visibility. Our data suggest that HCD has the potential to help researchers work more inclusively and collaboratively on interdisciplinary teams and generate more innovative and impactful science. The application of HCD methods is not without challenges; however, we believe these challenges can be overcome with institutional investment.

Keywords: Team science; collaboration; creativity; human centered design; inclusion; innovation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. National Research Council. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2015. - PubMed
    1. Disis ML, Slattery JT. The road we must take: multidisciplinary team science. Science Translational Medicine 2010; 2(22): 22cm29–22cm29. - PubMed
    1. Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 2007; 316(5827): 1036–1039. - PubMed
    1. Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP. The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008; 35(2): S77–S89. - PubMed
    1. Hall KL, Feng AX, Moser RP, Stokols D, Taylor BK. Moving the science of team science forward: collaboration and creativity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008; 35(2): S243–S249. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources