Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 10;24(8):102840.
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102840. eCollection 2021 Aug 20.

A framework for collaborative wolverine connectivity conservation

Affiliations

A framework for collaborative wolverine connectivity conservation

Kathleen A Carroll et al. iScience. .

Abstract

Maintaining connectivity between high-elevation public lands is important for wolverines and other species of conservation concern. This work represents the first effort to prioritize wolverine connectivity under future climate conditions using a systematic conservation planning framework. We optimized 10, 15, 20, and 50% of habitat features for wolverines using integer linear programming. We identified 369 privately owned areas in the 10% solution, 572 in the 15% solution, 822 in the 20% solution, and 3,996 in the 50% solution where voluntary landowner easements would improve the long-term landscape functionality for wolverine connectivity. The median estimated easements ranged from $8,762 to $12,220 across the four solutions (total costs $14,874,371 to $196,346,714). Overall, this effort demonstrates the utility of optimization problems for conserving connectivity, provides a proactive tool to engage potential collaborators, identifies easements that will likely protect various subalpine species, and offers a framework for the conservation of additional species.

Keywords: Earth sciences; Ecology; Environmental science; Nature conservation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Montana cadastral data potential easement values (www.cadastral.mt.gov).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Optimization output for the top 10%, 15%, 20%, and 50% frameworks within high connectivity value areas See Table S2 for land cover types associated with each solution.

References

    1. Adhikari A., Hansen A.J. Land use change and habitat fragmentation of wildland ecosystems of the North Central United States. Landscape Urban Plann. 2018;177:196–216.
    1. Ahmed S., Jackson-Smith D. Impacts of spatial patterns of rural and exurban residential development on agricultural trends in the intermountain west. SAGE Open. 2019;9 2158244019871037.
    1. Allen C.H., Parrott L., Kyle C. An individual-based modelling approach to estimate landscape connectivity for bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) PeerJ. 2016;4:e2001. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aycrigg J.L., Davidson A., Svancara L.K., Gergely K.J., McKerrow A., Scott J.M. Representation of ecological systems within the protected areas network of the continental United States. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54689. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baier L.E. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers; 2020. Saving Species on Private Lands: Unlocking Incentives to Conserve Wildlife and Their Habitats.

LinkOut - more resources