The clinical utility of exome and genome sequencing across clinical indications: a systematic review
- PMID: 34368901
- DOI: 10.1007/s00439-021-02331-x
The clinical utility of exome and genome sequencing across clinical indications: a systematic review
Abstract
Exome sequencing and genome sequencing have the potential to improve clinical utility for patients undergoing genetic investigations. However, evidence of clinical utility is limited to pediatric populations; we aimed to fill this gap by conducting a systematic review of the literature on the clinical utility of exome/genome sequencing across disease indications in pediatric and adult populations. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched between 2016 and 2020. Quantitative studies evaluating diagnostic yield were included; other measures of clinical utility such as changes to clinical management were documented if reported. Two reviewers screened, extracted data, and appraised risk of bias. Fifty studies met our inclusion criteria. All studies reported diagnostic yield, which ranged from 3 to 70%, with higher range of yields reported for neurological indications and acute illness ranging from 22 to 68% and 37-70%, respectively. Diagnoses triggered a range of clinical management changes including surveillance, reproductive-risk counseling, and identifying at-risk relatives in 4-100% of patients, with higher frequencies reported for acute illness ranging from 67 to 95%. The frequency of variants of uncertain significance ranged from 5 to 85% across studies with a potential trend of decreasing frequency over time and higher rates identified in patients of non-European ancestry. This review provides evidence for a higher range of diagnostic yield of exome/genome sequencing compared to standard genetic tests, particularly in neurological and acute indications. However, we identified significant heterogeneity in study procedures and outcomes, precluding a meaningful meta-analysis and certainty in the evidence available for decision-making. Future research that incorporates a comprehensive and consistent approach in capturing clinical utility of exome/genome sequencing across broader ancestral groups is necessary to improve diagnostic accuracy and yield and allow for analysis of trends over time.Prospero registration CRD42019094101.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Aintablian HK, Narayanan V, Belnap N, Ramsey K, Grebe TA (2017) An atypical presentation of ACAD9 deficiency: Diagnosis by whole exome sequencing broadens the phenotypic spectrum and alters treatment approach. Mol Genet Metab Rep 10:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgmr.2016.12.005 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Alankarage D, Ip E, Szot JO, Munro J, Blue GM, Harrison K, Dunwoodie SL (2019) Identification of clinically actionable variants from genome sequencing of families with congenital heart disease. Genet Med 21(5):1111–1120. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0296-x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Al-Nabhani M, Al-Rashdi S, Al-Murshedi F, Al-Kindi A, Al-Thihli K, Al-Saegh A, Al-Maawali A (2018) Reanalysis of exome sequencing data of intellectual disability samples: yields and benefits. Clin Genet 94(6):495–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.13438 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Alsubaie L, Aloraini T, Amoudi M, Swaid A, Eyiad W, Al Mutairi F, Alfares A (2020) Genomic testing and counseling: the contribution of next-generation sequencing to epilepsy genetics. Ann Hum Genet 84(6):431–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ahg.12397 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Amendola LM, Jarvik GP, Leo MC, McLaughlin HM, Akkari Y, Amaral MD, Rehm HL (2016) Performance of ACMG-AMP variant-interpretation guidelines among nine laboratories in the clinical sequencing exploratory research consortium. Am J Hum Genet 99(1):247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.06.001 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous