Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Apr;61(4):508-519.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.07.807. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

Adaptive Treatment for Youth With Substance Use and Depression: Early Depression Response and Short-term Outcomes

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Adaptive Treatment for Youth With Substance Use and Depression: Early Depression Response and Short-term Outcomes

John F Curry et al. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate prevalence and predictors of early depression response (EDR) in adolescents with substance use and depression receiving cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for substance use and to test the efficacy of supplemental CBT targeting depression (CBT-D) for non-EDR adolescents in an adaptive treatment approach.

Method: At 2 sites, 95 youths (ages 14-21, mean [SD] = 17.4 [1.8]) with alcohol or cannabis use and depressive symptoms received up to 12 sessions of CBT for substance use over 14 weeks. Assessments were at baseline and weeks 4, 9, and 14. The Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised was the primary depression measure, with a reduction of 50% or more on this scale at week 4 defining EDR. The primary substance use outcomes of alcohol use, heavy alcohol use, and cannabis use frequency were assessed via interview report on the Alcohol Consumption Questionnaire and the Drug Checklist. Urinalysis provided a secondary measure of cannabis use. Non-EDR adolescents were randomly assigned to supplemental CBT-D or enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU).

Results: Thirty-five adolescents (37%; 95% CI, 27%-47%) demonstrated EDR. Fewer days of cannabis use (odds ratio 0.977; 95% CI, 0.961-0.992) and absence of conduct disorder (odds ratio 0.149; 95% CI, 0.031-0.716) predicted EDR. Frequency of drinking (F1,82 = 11.09, η2 = 0.119, p = .001), heavy drinking (F1,82 = 19.91, η2 = 0.195, p < .0001), and cannabis use (F1,220 = 35.01, η2 = 0.137, p < .001) decreased over time for EDR, CBT-D, and ETAU adolescents, with EDR adolescents evidencing earlier lower cannabis use (F2,220 = 4.16, η2 = 0.036, p = .0169). Negative (clean) urine screens increased over time (F1,219 = 5.10, η2 = 0.023, p = .0249). Comparison of CBT-D and ETAU indicated that depression significantly decreased over time in both groups (F1,48 = 64.20, η2 = 0.572, p < .001), with no advantage for CBT-D.

Conclusion: Approximately one-third of adolescents with substance use and depression attain EDR during substance use treatment. Less frequent cannabis use facilitates depression response. The relatively small sample may have precluded identification of additional EDR predictors.

Clinical trial registration information: Treatment for Teens With Alcohol Abuse and Depression; https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT02227589.

Keywords: adaptive treatment; adolescence; cognitive-behavioral therapy; depression; substance use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
CONSORT Diagram for Adolescents in Adaptive Treatment for Substance Use and Depression
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2. Mean Depression Severity with 95% CI During Treatment for Substance use and Depression
Note: This figure illustrates severity of depression in adolescents with substance use and depression over 14 weeks of treatment. All participants received up to 12 sessions of motivation enhancement therapy/cognitive behavior therapy for substance use from baseline to week 14. At week 4, those with early depression response did not add a depression treatment, whereas non-early depression responders added either cognitive behavior therapy for depression or enhanced treatment as usual. CBT-D = cognitive behavior therapy for depression; CDRS-R = Children’s Depression Rating Scale-Revised; EDR = Early Depression Responders; ETAU = Enhanced treatment as usual for depression.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3. Mean Percentage Days of Cannabis Use with 95% CI During Treatment for Substance Use and Depression
Note: This figure illustrates percentage days of cannabis use in adolescents with substance use and depression over 14 weeks of treatment. All participants received up to 12 sessions of motivation enhancement therapy/cognitive behavior therapy for substance use from baseline to week 14. At week 4, those with early depression response did not add a depression treatment, whereas non-early depression responders added either cognitive behavior therapy for depression or enhanced treatment as usual for depression. CBT-D = cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression; CDRS-R = Children’s Depression Rating Scale-Revised; EDR = Early Depression Responders; ETAU = Enhanced treatment as usual for depression.

References

    1. Chassin L, Sher KJ, Hussong A, Curran P. The developmental psychopathology of alcohol use and alcohol disorders: Research achievement and future directions. Dev Psychopathol. 2013;25(402):1567–1584. doi:10.1017/S0954579413000771 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Merikangas KR, He JP, Burstein M, et al. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: Results from the national comorbidity survey replication-adolescent supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49(10):980–989. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Vol 170. (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services, ed.). Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.; 2019. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
    1. Marshall EJ. Adolescent alcohol use: Risks and consequences. Alcohol Alcohol. 2014;49(2):160–164. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agt180 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellingson JM, Ross JM, Winiger E, et al. Familial factors may not explain the effect of moderate-to-heavy cannabis use on cognitive functioning in adolescents: a sibling-comparison study. Addiction. Published online 2020:1–2. doi:10.1111/add.15207 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data