Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 26;21(15):5052.
doi: 10.3390/s21155052.

User Experience in Social Robots

Affiliations

User Experience in Social Robots

Elaheh Shahmir Shourmasti et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Social robots are increasingly penetrating our daily lives. They are used in various domains, such as healthcare, education, business, industry, and culture. However, introducing this technology for use in conventional environments is not trivial. For users to accept social robots, a positive user experience is vital, and it should be considered as a critical part of the robots' development process. This may potentially lead to excessive use of social robots and strengthen their diffusion in society. The goal of this study is to summarize the extant literature that is focused on user experience in social robots, and to identify the challenges and benefits of UX evaluation in social robots. To achieve this goal, the authors carried out a systematic literature review that relies on PRISMA guidelines. Our findings revealed that the most common methods to evaluate UX in social robots are questionnaires and interviews. UX evaluations were found out to be beneficial in providing early feedback and consequently in handling errors at an early stage. However, despite the importance of UX in social robots, robot developers often neglect to set UX goals due to lack of knowledge or lack of time. This study emphasizes the need for robot developers to acquire the required theoretical and practical knowledge on how to perform a successful UX evaluation.

Keywords: UX evaluation; human-robot interaction; social robots; systematic literature review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Frequency of studies per period of time.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sandry E., editor. Robots and Communication. Palgrave Macmillan; London, UK: 2015. Introduction; pp. 1–10.
    1. Zhang C., Wang W., Xi N., Wang Y., Liu L. Development and Future Challenges of Bio-Syncretic Robots. Engineering. 2018;4:452–463. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.07.005. - DOI
    1. Duffy B.R. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2003;42:177–190. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3. - DOI
    1. Malik A.A., Brem A. Digital twins for collaborative robots: A case study in human-robot interaction. Robot. Comput. Manuf. 2021;68:102092. doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102092. - DOI
    1. Graaf D.M. Ph.D. Thesis. Univesity of Twente; Twente, The Netherlands: 2015. Living with Robots: Investigating the User Acceptance of Social Robots in Domestic Environments.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources