Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 19;13(7):1400.
doi: 10.3390/v13071400.

Antibody Responsiveness to Influenza: What Drives It?

Affiliations
Review

Antibody Responsiveness to Influenza: What Drives It?

Xia Lin et al. Viruses. .

Abstract

The induction of a specific antibody response has long been accepted as a serological hallmark of recent infection or antigen exposure. Much of our understanding of the influenza antibody response has been derived from studying antibodies that target the hemagglutinin (HA) protein. However, growing evidence points to limitations associated with this approach. In this review, we aim to highlight the issue of antibody non-responsiveness after influenza virus infection and vaccination. We will then provide an overview of the major factors known to influence antibody responsiveness to influenza after infection and vaccination. We discuss the biological factors such as age, sex, influence of prior immunity, genetics, and some chronic infections that may affect the induction of influenza antibody responses. We also discuss the technical factors, such as assay choices, strain variations, and viral properties that may influence the sensitivity of the assays used to measure influenza antibodies. Understanding these factors will hopefully provide a more comprehensive picture of what influenza immunogenicity and protection means, which will be important in our effort to improve influenza vaccines.

Keywords: antibody responses; immunity; influenza; seroconversion; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An overview of the biological and technical factors discussed in this review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Iuliano A.D., Roguski K.M., Chang H.H., Muscatello D.J., Palekar R., Tempia S., Cohen C., Gran J.M., Schanzer D., Cowling B.J., et al. Estimates of global seasonal influenza-associated respiratory mortality: A modelling study. Lancet. 2018;391:1285–1300. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33293-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krammer F., Smith G.J.D., Fouchier R.A.M., Peiris M., Kedzierska K., Doherty P.C., Palese P., Shaw M.L., Treanor J., Webster R.G., et al. Influenza. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2018;4:3. doi: 10.1038/s41572-018-0002-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox R.J. Correlates of protection to influenza virus, where do we go from here? Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2013;9:405–408. doi: 10.4161/hv.22908. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson W.W., Shay D.K., Weintraub E., Brammer L., Cox N., Anderson L.J., Fukuda K. Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. JAMA. 2003;289:179–186. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.2.179. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taubenberger J.K., Kash J.C., Morens D.M. The 1918 influenza pandemic: 100 years of questions answered and unanswered. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019;11 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau5485. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances