Global palliative care research (2002-2020): bibliometric review and mapping analysis
- PMID: 34373283
- PMCID: PMC9691821
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-002982
Global palliative care research (2002-2020): bibliometric review and mapping analysis
Abstract
Background and objective: Despite the important benefits of a bibliometric approach on mapping a research field, relatively little efforts have previously been conducted to map and analyse the global trends of palliative care (PC)-related research. This bibliometric review aimed to provide an overall picture and systematic mapping of the state of research trends within the field of PC internationally.
Methods: Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched to retrieve original articles focusing on PC between 2002 and 2020. Searching was conducted on 5 May 2020, and was updated on 6 May 2021. All retrieved articles were assessed by title and abstract, and the bibliometric metadata of those that met the inclusion criteria were downloaded for analysis. The results were analysed by VOSviewer and Gephi software.
Results: A total of 19,199 articles met the inclusion criteria. Significant growth of the number of published articles was reported by around five-fold from 2002 to 2020. The USA and UK were the most productive countries in terms of the number of papers published and citations. Weak collaborations were observed between low-income or middle-income countries and high-income countries. Cancer-related PC research was the most common focus. Seven clusters of research were identified and included heart failure and cancer prognosis, nursing home, pain and symptoms management, PC knowledge and attitudes, quality improvement of services, PC ethics, and the ongoing assessment of PC services.
Conclusions: There is a need to expand PC-related research to non-cancer diseases. More international research and cross-institutional cooperation is required to address more global PC issues and benefit from wider sharing of expertees, potentially leading to higher quality or more impactful studies. Setting up research agendas and priorities from funding bodies and institutions may also enhance cooperation among researchers.
Keywords: bibliometric; clustering analysis; global trend; mapping; palliative care.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Porter AL, Kongthon A, Lu Jye-Chyi (JC). Research profiling: improving the literature review. Scientometrics 2002;53:351–70. 10.1023/A:1014873029258 - DOI
-
- Roemer RC, Borchardt R. Meaningful metrics: A 21st-century librarian’s guide to bibliometrics, altmetrics, and research impact. American Library Association, 2015.
-
- Andrés A. Measuring academic research: how to undertake a bibliometric study. Chandos Publishing. Elsevier, 2009.
-
- Haddow G. Measuring academic research: how to undertake a bibliometric study. Library Management, 2010: 370–2.
-
- Arunachalam S, Gunasekaran S. Tuberculosis research in India and China: from bibliometrics to research policy. Current Science 2002;82:933–47.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous