Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 9;8(6):e1059.
doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000001059. Print 2021 Nov.

Prognostic Accuracy of NEDA-3 in Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis

Affiliations

Prognostic Accuracy of NEDA-3 in Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis

Luca Prosperini et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: To estimate the proportions of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who despite achieving the no evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3) status in the first 2 treatment years experienced relapse-associated worsening (RAW) or progression independent from relapse activity (PIRA) in the following years.

Methods: We selected patients with NEDA-3-defined as no relapse, no disability worsening, and no MRI activity-in the first 2 years of either glatiramer acetate or interferon beta as initial treatment. We estimated the long-term probability of subsequent RAW and PIRA (considered as 2 contrasting outcomes) by cumulative incidence functions. Competing risk regressions were used to identify the baseline (i.e., at treatment start) predictors of RAW and PIRA.

Results: Of 687 patients, 224 (32.6%) had NEDA-3 in the first 2 treatment years. After a median follow-up time of 12 years from treatment start, 58 patients (26%) experienced disability accrual: 31 (14%) had RAW and 27 (12%) had PIRA. RAW was predicted by the presence of >9 T2 lesions (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 3.92, p = 0.012) and contrast-enhancing lesions (SHR = 2.38, p = 0.047) on baseline MRI scan and either temporary or permanent discontinuation of the initial treatment (SHR = 1.11, p = 0.015). PIRA was predicted by advancing age (SHR = 1.05, p = 0.036 for each year increase) and presence of ≥1 spinal cord lesion on baseline MRI scan (SHR = 4.08, p = 0.016).

Discussion: The adoption of NEDA-3 criteria led to prognostic misclassification in 1 of 4 patients. Different risk factors were associated with RAW and PIRA, suggesting alternative mechanisms for disability accrual.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with RRMS who attained NEDA-3 status, subsequent RAW was associated with baseline MRI activity and discontinuation of treatment and PIRA was associated with age and the presence of baseline spinal cord lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study Flowchart of Patients' Disposition
Figure 2
Figure 2. (A) Cumulative Incidence Functions of Progression Relapse-Associated Worsening (RAW) and Progression Independent From Relapse Activity (PIRA) in Patients With No Evidence of Disease Activity-3 (NEDA-3) After 2 Years From Treatment Start; (B) Disability Changes, Expressed as Step of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), by Long-term Outcomes (n = 224)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Proportion of Patients Experiencing Relapse-Associated Worsening (RAW) and Progression Independent From Relapse Activity (PIRA) by Disease Activity After 2 Years From Treatment Start (Median Follow-up Time of 12 Years)
EDA-3 = evidence of disease activity-3 (n = 463); NEDA-3 = no evidence of disease activity-3 (n = 224).

References

    1. Giovannoni G, Tomic D, Bright JR, Havrdová E. ‟No evident disease activity”: the use of combined assessments in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2017;23(9):1179-1187. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rotstein DL, Healy BC, Malik MT, Chitnis T, Weiner HL. Evaluation of No evidence of disease activity in a 7-year longitudinal multiple sclerosis cohort. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(2):152-158. - PubMed
    1. Hegen H, Bsteh G, Berger T. ‟No evidence of disease activity”–is it an appropriate surrogate in multiple sclerosis? Eur J Neurol. 2018;25(9):1107-e101. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gasperini C, Prosperini L, Tintoré M, et al. . Unraveling treatment response in multiple sclerosis: a clinical and MRI challenge. Neurology. 2019;92(4):180-192. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kappos L, Wolinsky JS, Giovannoni G, et al. . Contribution of relapse-independent progression vs relapse-associated worsening to overall confirmed disability accumulation in typical relapsing multiple sclerosis in a pooled analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(9):1132-1140. - PMC - PubMed

Substances