Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;33(1):56-68.
doi: 10.1038/s41370-021-00374-w. Epub 2021 Aug 9.

Computational estimates of daily aggregate exposure to PFOA/PFOS from 2011 to 2017 using a basic intake model

Alexander East  1 , Peter P Egeghy  1 , Elaine A Cohen Hubal  2 , Rachel Slover  2 , Daniel A Vallero  3
Affiliations

Computational estimates of daily aggregate exposure to PFOA/PFOS from 2011 to 2017 using a basic intake model

Alexander East et al. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Human exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances has been modeled to estimate serum concentrations. Given that the production and use of these compounds have decreased in recent years, especially PFOA and PFOS, and that additional concentration data have become available from the US and other industrialized countries over the past decade, aggregate median intakes of these two compounds were estimated using more recent data.

Methods: Summary statistics from secondary sources were collected, averaged, and mapped for indoor and outdoor air, water, dust, and soil for PFOA and PFOS to estimate exposures for adults and children. European dietary intake estimates were used to estimate daily intake from food.

Results: In accordance with decreased concentrations in media, daily intake estimates among adults, i.e., 40 ng/day PFOA and 40 ng/day PFOS, are substantially lower than those reported previously, as are children's estimates of 14 ng/day PFOA and 17 ng/day PFOS. Using a first-order pharmacokinetic model, these results compare favorably to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey serum concentration measurements.

Conclusion: Concomitant blood concentrations support this enhanced estimation approach that captures the decline of PFOA/PFOS serum concentration over a decade.

Keywords: Aggregate daily; Exposure model; PFOA; PFOS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Generalized demonstrated approach to assessing exposure in this paper.
GM geometric mean, GSD geometric standard deviation, NHANES National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, PK pharmacokinetic.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. PFOA and PFOS exposure route boxplots for adults and children.
Daily route-specific estimates are provided for dust ingestion, dietary ingestion, water ingestion, dermal dust absorption, indoor inhalation, outdoor inhalation, and soil ingestion in ng/day. Boxplots show estimated for PFOA, adults and children, followed by PFOS, adults and children. n = 2000.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. The 2013-2014 NHANES serum concentration and model estimate for PFOA and PFOS in adults.
The distribution represents measured serum concentrations (ng/mL) in NHANES. The red and blue lines show the medians for the NHANES distribution and the model estimate respectively. Plots for PFOA and PFOS are shown for adults (age >= 18). NHANES data n = 1988.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. A sensitivity analysis of steady-state and dynamical models for PFOA and PFOS in Adults with variation in volume of distribution (Vd), and the corresponding impact on the serum concentration (ng/mL).
The red, blue, and black lines represent different Vd values. The steady-state model returns a horizontal line, whereas the dynamical model is the curved line that approaches steady-state over time. The first plot is PFOA in adults and the second is PFOS in adults.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Agency for Toxic Substances Disease Registry. Toxicological profile for perfluoroalkyls. Draft for public comment. Updated June 2018. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp200.pdf (2018). Accessed 31 Aug 2020.
    1. US Environmental Protection Agency. Perfluoroalkyl sulfonates; Significant New Use Rule. 40 CFR 721 ed. Federal Register; 2002. 72854–67.
    1. US Environmental Protection Agency. PFAS action plan: program update February 2020, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards. Updated February 27, 2020. https://www.epa.gov/pfas/pfas-action-plan-program-update-february-2020 (2020). Accessed 31 Aug 2020.
    1. Egeghy PP, Lorber M. An assessment of the exposure of Americans to perfluorooctane sulfonate: a comparison of estimated intake with values inferred from NHANES data. J Exposure Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011;21:150–68. - PubMed
    1. Lorber M, Egeghy PP. Simple intake and pharmacokinetic modeling to characterize exposure of Americans to perfluoroctanoic acid, PFOA. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:8006–14. - PubMed

Publication types