Clozapine levels as a predictor for therapeutic response: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 34374073
- DOI: 10.1111/acps.13361
Clozapine levels as a predictor for therapeutic response: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: Clozapine levels may be a more useful predictor of therapeutic response than the dose, given the variability in clozapine metabolism between individuals. We therefore systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the impact of clozapine levels on response and/or relapse to provide guidance on optimal clozapine levels.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, PsycInfo and Embase for studies exploring clozapine levels and response and/or relapse. Our primary meta-analysis was rates of response above and below clozapine level thresholds of 350 ng/ml and 600 ng/ml. Secondary analyses were undertaken of mean clozapine levels, dose and concentration/dose (C/D) ratio and response and/or relapse. A meta-regression by study duration was conducted.
Results: Twenty studies met inclusion criteria. Clozapine levels above 350 ng/ml were associated with statistically significantly higher rates of response (OR 2.27 95% CI 1.40-3.67, p < 0.001), but not above 600 ng/ml (OR 1.40 95% CI 0.85-2.31, p = 0.19). Higher mean clozapine levels were associated with better rates of response (SMD 0.24, 95% CI 0.00-0.49, p = 0.05), and lower rates of relapse (SMD -0.72, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.19, p = 0.008). By contrast, neither clozapine dose nor C/D ratio was associated with differing rates of response. Similarly, study duration did not affect outcome.
Conclusions: Our findings are in keeping with current guidelines that recommend targeting clozapine levels above 350 ng/ml before augmentation is considered. As some clozapine associated ADRs are dose dependent, levels above 600 ng/ml may have an unfavourable risk-benefit ratio.
Keywords: clozapine; levels; meta-analysis; relapse; response.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Clozapine treatment in a wider context: From before eligibility to life beyond clozapine.Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 Nov;144(5):419-421. doi: 10.1111/acps.13374. Epub 2021 Oct 8. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021. PMID: 34622947 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Howes OD, McCutcheon R, Agid O, et al. Treatment-resistant schizophrenia: treatment response and resistance in psychosis (TRRIP) working group consensus guidelines on diagnosis and terminology. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174(3):216-229.
-
- Siskind D, Orr S, Sinha S, et al. Rates of treatment resistant schizophrenia from first episode cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2021;1-6.
-
- Siskind D, McCartney L, Goldschlager R, Kisely S. Clozapine v. first-and second-generation antipsychotics in treatment-refractory schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;209(5):385-392.
-
- Land R, Siskind D, Mcardle P, Kisely S, Winckel K, Hollingworth SA. The impact of clozapine on hospital use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017;135(4):296-309.
-
- Vermeulen JM, van Rooijen G, van de Kerkhof MPJ, Sutterland AL, Correll CU, de Haan L. Clozapine and long-term mortality risk in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies lasting 1.1-12.5 years. Schizophr Bull. 2019;45(2):315-329.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
