Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119118.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19118.

Association of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Timeliness and Number of Doses With Age-Specific Pertussis Risk in Infants and Young Children

Affiliations

Association of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Timeliness and Number of Doses With Age-Specific Pertussis Risk in Infants and Young Children

Madhura S Rane et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: In most countries, the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine is administered as a 3-dose infant series followed by additional booster doses in the first 5 years of life. Short-term immunity from the DTaP vaccine can depend on the number, timing, and interval between doses. Not receiving doses in a timely manner might be associated with a higher pertussis risk.

Objective: To examine the association between number and timeliness of vaccine doses and age-specific pertussis risk.

Design, setting, and participants: This population-based, retrospective cohort study used Washington State Immunization Information System data and pertussis surveillance data from Public Health Seattle and King County, Washington. Included participants were children aged 3 months to 9 years born or living in King County, Washington, between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017. Data were analyzed from June 30 to December 1, 2019.

Exposures: Being undervaccinated (receiving fewer than recommended doses at a given age) or delayed vaccination (not receiving doses within time frames recommended by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

Main outcomes and measures: Suspected, probable, and confirmed pertussis diagnosis.

Results: A total of 316 404 children (median age, 65.2 months [interquartile range, 35.3-94.1 months]; 162 025 boys [51.2%]) as of December 31, 2017, with 17.4 million person-months of follow-up were included in the analysis. A total of 19 943 children (6.3%) had no vaccines recorded in the Immunization Information System, 116 193 (36.7%) received a vaccine with a delay, and 180 268 (56.9%) were fully vaccinated with no delay. Delayed vaccination and undervaccination rates were higher for older children (17.6% delayed or undervaccinated at age 2 months for dose 1 at 3 months vs 41.6% at age 5 years for dose 5) but improved for successive birth cohorts (52.2% for 2008 birth cohort vs 32.3% for 2017 birth cohort). Undervaccination was significantly associated with higher risk of pertussis for the 3-dose primary series (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 4.8; 95% CI, 3.1-7.6), the first booster (aRR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.3-4.5), and the second booster (aRR, 4.6; 95% CI, 2.6-8.2). However, delay in vaccination among children who received the recommended number of vaccine doses was not associated with pertussis risk.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that undervaccination is associated with higher pertussis risk. Short delays in vaccine receipt may be less important if the age-appropriate number of doses is administered, but delaying doses is not recommended. Ensuring that children receive all doses of pertussis vaccine, even if there is some delay, is important.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Halloran reported receiving grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Comment in

References

    1. Cherry J, Brunell P, Golden G, Karzon D. Report of the task force on pertussis and pertussis immunization-1988. Pediatrics. 1988;81(suppl):933–984.
    1. Rohani P, Drake JM. The decline and resurgence of pertussis in the US. Epidemics. 2011;3(3-4):183-188. doi:10.1016/j.epidem.2011.10.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klein NP, Bartlett J, Fireman B, et al. . Waning protection following 5 doses of a 3-component diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine. Vaccine. 2017;35(26):3395-3400. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller E, Siegrist C-A, Tharmaphornpilas P, et al. WHO SAGE pertussis working group: background paper SAGE April 2014. Accessed January 5, 2017. http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/april/1_Pertussis_bac...
    1. Forsyth KD, Tan T, von König CW, Heininger U, Chitkara AJ, Plotkin S. Recommendations to control pertussis prioritized relative to economies: a global pertussis initiative update. Vaccine. 2018;36(48):7270-7275. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.028 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances