Resizing a large pouch after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparing the effect of two techniques on weight loss
- PMID: 34374871
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08671-z
Resizing a large pouch after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparing the effect of two techniques on weight loss
Abstract
Background: Insufficient weight loss or weight regain has many causes including a large gastric pouch. A large gastric pouch may be due to the surgical technique or can be patient related (dilation). Resizing the gastric pouch may lead to additional weight loss. Currently, there is no gold standard for the revisional surgical technique. Therefore this study was performed to determine which surgical technique for revisional bariatric surgery (BS) has superior outcomes in terms of weight loss: sleeve resection of the gastrojejunostomy and gastric pouch (SGP), or resection of the gastrojejunostomy with resizing of the pouch and creation of a new anastomosis (RGJ).
Methods: All patients who underwent revisional BS for insufficient weight loss or weight regain as a result of an enlarged pouch after LRYGB from April 2014 to June 2018 in our hospitals were included in this observational cohort study. Outcomes were measured in percentage total weight loss (%TWL).
Results: A total of 37 patients who underwent SGP and 21 patients who underwent RGJ as revisional BS were included in this study. The median body mass index before revisional BS was 37.6 kg/m2 versus 35.7 kg/m2 (SGP vs RGJ, respectively, P = 0.115). There was no significant difference in %TWL between the two cohorts 1 and 2 years after revisional BS, respectively; SGP 14.5% vs RGJ 11.0%, P = 0.885 and SGP 12.3% vs RGJ 10.8%, P = 0.604. Comparing %TWL based on weight at LRYGB, there was also no significant difference two years after revisional BS (SGP 22.0% vs RGJ 22.2%, P = 0.885). The average use of surgical disposables for the SGP technique were lower compared to the RGJ technique.
Conclusions: Resizing a large pouch leads to additional weight loss. Both techniques have comparable outcomes in terms of weight loss. However, based on average surgical costs, the SGP technique may be preferable.
Keywords: Enlarged gastric pouch; Gastric bypass; Resizing gastric pouch; Revisional bariatric surgery.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Dahlgren S, Larsson B, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Sullivan M, Wedel H, Swedish Obese Subjects Study Scientific G (2004) Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 351:2683–2693 - DOI
-
- Lager CJ, Esfandiari NH, Luo Y, Subauste AR, Kraftson AT, Brown MB, Varban OA, Meral R, Cassidy RB, Nay CK, Lockwood AL, Bellers D, Buda CM, Oral EA (2018) Metabolic parameters, weight loss, and comorbidities 4 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 28:3415–3423 - DOI
-
- Dogan K, Betzel B, Homan J, Aarts EO, Ploeger N, de Boer H, Aufenacker TJ, van Laarhoven CJ, Janssen IM, Berends FJ (2014) Long-term effects of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 24:1835–1842 - DOI
-
- El Ansari W, Elhag W (2021) Weight regain and insufficient weight loss after bariatric surgery: definitions, prevalence, mechanisms, predictors, prevention and management strategies, and knowledge gaps-a scoping review. Obes Surg 31:1755 - DOI
-
- Karmali S, Brar B, Shi X, Sharma AM, de Gara C, Birch DW (2013) Weight recidivism post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg 23:1922–1933 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources