Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 1;26(5):542-546.
doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000912.

Disparities in living donation

Affiliations
Review

Disparities in living donation

Reynold I Lopez-Soler et al. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Living organ donation provides improved access to transplantation, thereby shortening transplant wait times and allowing for more deceased organ transplants. However, disparity in access to living donation has resulted in decreased rates of living donor transplants for some populations of patients.

Recent findings: Though there have been marked improvements in deceased donor equity, there are still challenges as it relates to gender, racial/ethnic, and socio-economic disparity. Improvements in living donation rates in Hispanic and Asian populations are tempered by challenges in African American rates of organ donation. Socio-economic disparity may drive gender disparities in organ donation resulting in disproportionate female living donors. Tailored approaches relating to language-specific interventions as well as directed educational efforts have helped mitigate disparity. Additionally, the use of apolipoprotein1 testing and modifications of glomerular filtration rate calculators may improve rates of African American donation. This review will evaluate recent data in living donor disparity as well as highlight successes in mitigating disparity.

Summary: Though there are still challenges in living donor disparity, many efforts at tailoring education and access as well as modifying living donor evaluation and identifying systemic policy changes may result in improvements in living donation rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jofré R, López-Gómez JM, Moreno F, et al. Changes in quality of life after renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32:93–100.
    1. Cecka M. Clinical outcome of renal transplantation. Factors influencing patient and graft survival. Surg Clin N Am 1998; 78:133–148.
    1. Berg CL, Merion RM, Shearon TH, et al. Liver transplant recipient survival benefit with living donation in the model for endstage liver disease allocation era. Hepatology 2011; 54:1313–1321.
    1. Kulkarni S, Ladin K, Haakinson D, et al. Association of racial disparities with access to kidney transplant after the implementation of the new kidney allocation system. JAMA Surg 2019; 154:618–625.
    1. Massie AB, Luo X, Lonze BE, et al. Early changes in kidney distribution under the new allocation system. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 27:2495–2501.