Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 12;7(4):748-754.
doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnab024. eCollection 2020 Dec.

3D-printed models for periacetabular osteotomy surgical planning

Affiliations

3D-printed models for periacetabular osteotomy surgical planning

B Keegan Markhardt et al. J Hip Preserv Surg. .

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and clinical benefits of using 3D-printed hemipelvis models for periacetabular osteotomy preoperative planning in the treatment of hip dysplasia. This retrospective study included 28 consecutive cases in 26 patients, with two bilateral cases, who underwent periacetabular osteotomy between January 2017 and February 2020 and had routine radiographs, CT and MR imaging. Of these, 14 cases [mean patient age 30.7 (SD 8.4) years, 11 female] had routine preoperative imaging, and 14 cases [mean patient age 28.0 (SD 8.7) years, 13 female] had routine preoperative imaging and creation of a full-scale 3D-printed hemipelvis model from the CT data. The expected surgical cuts were performed on the 3D-printed models. All patients underwent Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Operative times, including time to achieve proper acetabular position and total periacetabular osteotomy time, fluoroscopy radiation dose and estimated total blood loss were compiled. ANOVA compared outcome variables between the two patient groups, controlling for possible confounders. On average, patients who had additional preoperative planning using the 3D-printed model had a 5.5-min reduction in time to achieve proper acetabular position and a 14.5-min reduction in total periacetabular osteotomy time; however, these changes were not statistically significant (P = 0.526 and 0.151, respectively). No significant difference was identified in fluoroscopy radiation dose or total blood loss. Detailed surgical planning for periacetabular osteotomy using 3D-printed models is feasible using widely available and affordable technology and shows promise to improve surgical efficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
A 29-year-old woman with right hip dysplasia undergoing evaluation and PAO. Photographs of the 3D-printed model hemipelvis taken before (A) and after (B) expected PAO cuts (and glue fixation) for preoperative planning. Preoperative (C) and postoperative (D) standing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs show treatment of the dysplastic acetabulum with the lateral central edge angle measuring 18° before surgery and 31° after surgery.

References

    1. Loder RT, Skopelja EN. The epidemiology and demographics of hip dysplasia. ISRN Orthopedics 2011; 2011: 238607. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pun S. Hip dysplasia in the young adult caused by residual childhood and adolescent-onset dysplasia. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2016; 9: 427–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leunig M, Siebenrock KA, Ganz R. Rationale of periacetabular osteotomy and background work. Instr Course Lect 2001; 50: 229–38. - PubMed
    1. Villar R. What is hip preservation? J Hip Preserv Surg 2018; 5: 103–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wyles CC, Vargas JS, Heidenreich MJ et al. Natural history of the dysplastic hip following modern periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101: 932–8. - PubMed