Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 28;8(2):20551029211029149.
doi: 10.1177/20551029211029149. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.

What are weight bias measures measuring? An evaluation of core measures of weight bias and weight bias internalisation

Sarah-Jane F Stewart  1 , Jane Ogden  1
Affiliations
Review

What are weight bias measures measuring? An evaluation of core measures of weight bias and weight bias internalisation

Sarah-Jane F Stewart et al. Health Psychol Open. .

Abstract

Research exploring weight bias and weight bias internalisation (WBI) is grounded upon several core measures. This study aimed to evaluate whether operationalisations of these measures matched their conceptualisations in the literature. Using a 'closed card-sorting' methodology, participants sorted items from the most used measures into pre-defined categories, reflecting weight bias and non-weight bias. Findings indicated a high degree of congruence between WBI conceptualisations and operationalisations, however found less congruence between weight bias conceptualisations and operationalisations, with scale-items largely sorted into non-weight bias domains. Recommendations for scale modifications and developments are presented alongside a new amalgamated weight bias scale (AWBS).

Keywords: beliefs; health psychology; illness perception; obesity; stigma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cumulative percentages of weight bias scale-items sorted into each category.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cumulative percentages of WBI scale-items sorted into each category.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alberga AS, Russell-Mayhew S, von Ranson KM, et al.. (2016) Weight bias: A call to action. Journal of Eating Disorders 4(1): 34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allison DB, Basile VC, Yuker HE. (1991) The measurement of attitudes toward and beliefs about obese persons. International Journal of Eating Disorders 10(5): 599–607.
    1. Cook JE, Purdie-Vaughns V, Meyer IH, et al.. (2014) Intervening within and across levels: A multilevel approach to stigma and public health. Social Science & Medicine 103: 101–109. - PubMed
    1. Corrigan PW, Watson AC, Barr L. (2006) The self-stigma of mental illness: Implications for self-esteem and self-efficacy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 25(8): 875–884.
    1. Crandall C, Biernat M. (1990) The ideology of anti-fat attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 20(3): 227–243.

LinkOut - more resources