Variability in electrodiagnostic findings associated with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome
- PMID: 34378193
- PMCID: PMC9292757
- DOI: 10.1002/mus.27395
Variability in electrodiagnostic findings associated with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome
Abstract
Introduction/aims: Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) is a heterogeneous and often disputed entity. An electrodiagnostic pattern of T1 > C8 axon involvement is considered characteristic for the diagnosis of NTOS. However, since the advent of high-resolution nerve ultrasound (US) imaging, we have encountered several patients with a proven entrapment of the lower brachial plexus who showed a different, variable electrodiagnostic pattern.
Methods: In this retrospective case series, 14 patients with an NTOS diagnosis with a verified source of compression of the lower brachial plexus and abnormal findings on their electrodiagnostic testing were included. Their medical records were reviewed to obtain clinical, imaging, and electrodiagnostic data.
Results: Seven patients showed results consistent with the "classic" T1 axon > C8 pattern of involvement. Less typical findings included equally severe involvement of T1 and C8 axons, more severe C8 involvement, pure motor abnormalities, neurogenic changes on needle electromyography in the flexor carpi radialis and biceps brachii muscles, and one patient with an abnormal sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude for the median sensory response recorded from the third digit. Patients with atypical findings on electrodiagnostic testing underwent nerve imaging more often compared to patients with classic findings (seven of seven patients vs. five of seven respectively), especially nerve ultrasound.
Discussion: When there is a clinical suspicion of NTOS, an electrodiagnostic finding other than the classic T1 > C8 pattern of involvement does not rule out the diagnosis. High resolution nerve imaging is valuable to diagnose additional patients with this treatable condition.
Keywords: brachial plexopathy; clinical neurophysiology; electrodiagnostic studies; nerve ultrasound; neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.
© 2021 The Authors. Muscle & Nerve published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.
Figures


Comment in
-
Value and pitfalls of imaging and electrodiagnosis in neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome: Lessons learned from present and past.Muscle Nerve. 2022 Jan;65(1):4-6. doi: 10.1002/mus.27431. Epub 2021 Oct 21. Muscle Nerve. 2022. PMID: 34609742 No abstract available.
References
-
- Illig KA, Rodriguez‐Zoppi E. How common is thoracic outlet syndrome? Thorac Surg Clin. 2021;31(1):11‐17. - PubMed
-
- Gilliatt RW. In: Dyck P, Thomas P, Lambert E, Bunge R, eds. Thoracic Outlet Syndromes. W.B. Saunders; 1984.
-
- Mackinnon SE, Novak CB. Evaluation of the patient with thoracic outlet syndrome. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;8(2):190‐200. - PubMed
-
- Galis F. Why do almost all mammals have seven cervical vertebrae? Developmental constraints, Hox genes, and cancer. J Exp Zool. 1999;285(1):19‐26. - PubMed
-
- Wilbourn AJ. Thoracic outlet syndrome is overdiagnosed. Muscle Nerve. 1999;22(1):130‐136; discussion 136‐137. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical