Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;39(5):542-547.
doi: 10.1177/10499091211036706. Epub 2021 Aug 11.

Advance Care Planning in Chronically Ill Patients With an Episodic Disease Trajectory in the Acute Care Setting: A Quality Improvement Project

Affiliations

Advance Care Planning in Chronically Ill Patients With an Episodic Disease Trajectory in the Acute Care Setting: A Quality Improvement Project

Molly T Williams et al. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 May.

Abstract

Introduction: Advance care planning (ACP) is a fluid discussion between patients and providers to define preferences for future medical care. In the acute care setting, ACP is limited due to lack of structured process for identifying persons who may benefit from ACP. This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to increase the frequency of ACP discussions and documentation of preferences by targeting geriatric patients with an episodic disease trajectory for ACP.

Methods: This project used an intervention and comparison group design to target English-speaking, geriatric adults at a large academic medical center with a diagnosis of NYHA class III/IV HF and/or GOLD criteria III/IV COPD for ACP discussions. The intervention group was compared to a group with a range of diagnoses who were approached in a non-systematic way.

Results: Thirteen (n = 13) participants completed all aspects of the QI project. Results showed a non-significant increase in the number of patients with a diagnosis of HF and/or COPD who participated in an ACP discussion when compared to the comparison group (n = 20, p = 0.131), as well as a non-significant increase in the number of ACP tools documented in the HER (53.8% compared to 30%) (x = 1.877, p = 0.171).

Conclusion: While this project demonstrated non-significant statistical results in the incidence and documentation of an ACP tool, this project increased the number of ACP discussions had, which is clinically significant.

Keywords: ACP tool; COPD; HF; advance care planning; episodic disease trajectory; geriatric.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources