Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;117(5):924-931.
doi: 10.36660/abc.20200600.

Performance of the Electrocardiogram in the Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Older and Very Older Hypertensive Patients

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Affiliations

Performance of the Electrocardiogram in the Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Older and Very Older Hypertensive Patients

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Fernando Focaccia Povoa et al. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an important cardiovascular risk factor, regardless of arterial hypertension. Despite the evolution of imaging tests, the electrocardiogram (ECG) is still the most used in the initial evaluation, however, with low sensitivity.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of the main electrocardiographic criteria for LVH in elderly and very elderly hypertensive individuals.

Methods: In a cohort of hypertensive patients, ECGs and doppler echocardiographies (ECHO) were performed and separated into three age groups: <60 years, Group I; 60-79 years Group II; and ≥80 years, Group III. The most used electrocardiographic criteria were applied for the diagnosis of LVH: Perugia; Pegaro-Lo Presti; Gubner-Ungerleider; Narita; (Rm+Sm) x duration; Cornell voltage; Cornell voltage duration; Sokolow-Lyon voltage; R of aVL ≥11 mm; RaVL duration. In evaluating the performance of these criteria, in addition to sensitivity (Sen) and specificity (Esp), the "Diagnostic Odds Ratios" (DOR) were analyzed. We considered p-value <0.05 for the analyses, with two-tailed tests.

Results: In 2,458 patients, LVH was present by ECHO in 781 (31.7%). In Groups I and II, the best performances were for the criteria of Narita, Perugia, (Rm+Sm) x duration, with no statistical differences between them. In Group III (very elderly) the Perugia criteria and (Rm+Sm) x duration had the best performances: Perugia [44,7/89.3; (Sen/Esp)] and (Rm+Sm) duration [39.4%/91.3%; (Sen/Esp), p<0.05)], with the best PAIN results:6.8. This suggests that in this very elderly population, these criteria have greater discriminatory power to separate patients with LVH.

Conclusion: In very elderly hypertensive patients, the Perugia electrocardiographic criteria and (Rm+Sm) x duration showed the best diagnostic performance for LVH.

Fundamento: A hipertrofia ventricular esquerda (HVE) é um importante fator de risco cardiovascular, independente da hipertensão arterial. Apesar da evolução dos exames de imagem, o eletrocardiograma (ECG) ainda é o mais utilizado na avaliação inicial, porém, com baixa sensibilidade.

Objetivo: Avaliar o desempenho dos principais critérios eletrocardiográficos para HVE em indivíduos hipertensos idosos e muito idosos.

Métodos: Em coorte de hipertensos foram realizados ECGs e EcoDopplercardiogramas (ECO), e separados em três grupos etários: <60 anos, Grupo I; 60-79 anos Grupo II; e ≥80 anos, Grupo III. Os critérios eletrocardiográficos mais utilizados foram aplicados para o diagnóstico da HVE: Perúgia; Peguero-Lo Presti; Gubner-Ungerleider; Narita; (Rm+Sm) x duração; Cornell voltagem; Cornell voltagem duração; Sokolow-Lyon voltagem; R de aVL ≥11 mm; RaVL duração. Na avaliação do desempenho desses critérios, além da sensibilidade (Sen) e especificidade (Esp), foram analisadas as “Odds Ratios diagnóstico” (DOR). Consideramos p-valor <0,05 para as análises, com testes bi-caudais.

Resultados: Em 2.458 pacientes, a HVE estava presente pelo ECO em 781 (31,7%). Nos Grupos I e II, os melhores desempenhos foram para os critérios de Narita, Perúgia, (Rm+Sm) x duração, sem diferenças estatísticas entre eles. No Grupo III (muito idosos) os critérios de Perúgia e (Rm+Sm) x duração tiveram os melhores desempenhos: Perúgia [44,7/89,3; (Sen/Esp)] e (Rm+Sm) duração [39,4%/91,3%; (Sen/Esp), p<0,05)], com os melhores resultados de DOR:6,8. Isto sugere que nessa população de muito idosos esses critérios têm maior poder discriminatório para separar pacientes com HVE.

Conclusão: Nos hipertensos muito idosos os critérios eletrocardiográficos de Perúgia e (Rm+Sm) x duração apresentaram os melhores desempenhos diagnósticos para HVE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potencial conflito de interesse

Não há conflito com o presente artigo

Figures

Figura 1
Figura 1. Fluxograma da coorte estudada. ECG: eletrocardiograma.
Figura 2
Figura 2. Curvas ROC dos grupos estudados. Grupo I (idade <60 anos); b) Grupo II (idade 60 a 79 anos); c) Grupo III (idade ≥80 anos). ROC: Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves; AUC: área sob a curva.
Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study cohort. ECG: electrocardiogram.
Figure 2
Figure 2. ROC curve and area under the curve of the three studied grups.Group I (age <60 years); b) Group II (age 60-79 years); c) (age ≥80 years). OC: Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves, AUC: area under the curve.

Comment in

References

    1. Xie L, Wang Z. Correlation between echocardiographic left ventricular mass index and electrocardiographic variables used in left ventricular hypertrophy criteria in Chinese hypertensive patients. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2010;51:391–401. - PubMed
    2. Xie L, Wang Z. Correlation between echocardiographic left ventricular mass index and electrocardiographic variables used in left ventricular hypertrophy criteria in Chinese hypertensive patients. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2010; 51: 391-401. - PubMed
    1. Iribarren C, Round AD, Lu M, et al. Cohort study of ECG left ventricular hypertrophy trajectories: ethnic disparities, associations with cardiovascular outcomes, and clinical utility. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(10):e004954. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Iribarren C, Round AD, Lu M, et al. Cohort study of ECG left ventricular hypertrophy trajectories: ethnic disparities, associations with cardiovascular outcomes, and clinical utility. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6(10): e004954. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Jern S, et al. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy during antihypertensive treatment and the prediction of major cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2004;292:2343–2349. - PubMed
    2. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Jern S, et al. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy during antihypertensive treatment and the prediction of major cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2004; 292: 2343-9. - PubMed
    1. Levy D, Lalib SB, Anderson KM. Determinants of sensitivy and specificity of eletrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1990;81:815–820. - PubMed
    2. Levy D, Lalib SB, Anderson KM. Determinants of sensitivy and specificity of eletrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1990; 81: 815-20. - PubMed
    1. Rautaharju PM, Zhoiu SH, Calhoun HP. Ethnic differences in ECG amplitudes in North American white, black, and Hispanic men and women. Effect of obesity and age. J Electrocardiol. 1994;27(Suppl):20–31. - PubMed
    2. Rautaharju PM, Zhoiu SH, Calhoun HP. Ethnic differences in ECG amplitudes in North American white, black, and Hispanic men and women. Effect of obesity and age. J Electrocardiol. 1994; 27 Suppl:20-31. - PubMed