Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 1;73(4):388-395.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000919. Epub 2021 Aug 13.

Policy Makers' Priorities for Addressing Youth Substance Use and Factors That Influence Priorities

Affiliations

Policy Makers' Priorities for Addressing Youth Substance Use and Factors That Influence Priorities

Jonathan Purtle et al. Psychiatr Serv. .

Abstract

Objective: Understanding public policy makers' priorities for addressing youth substance use and the factors that influence these priorities can inform the dissemination and implementation of strategies that promote evidence-based decision making. This study characterized the priorities of policy makers in substance use agencies of U.S. states and counties for addressing youth substance use, the factors that influenced these priorities, and the differences in priorities and influences between state and county policy makers.

Methods: In 2020, a total of 122 substance use agency policy makers from 35 states completed a Web-based survey (response rate=22%). Respondents rated the priority of 14 issues related to youth substance use and the extent to which nine factors influenced these priorities. Data were analyzed as dichotomous and continuous variables and for state and county policy makers together and separately.

Results: The highest priorities for youth substance use were social determinants of substance use (87%), adverse childhood experiences and childhood trauma (85%), and increasing access to school-based substance use programs (82%). The lowest priorities were increasing access to naloxone for youths (49%), increasing access to medications for opioid use disorder among youths (49%), and deimplementing non-evidence-based youth substance use programs (41%). The factors that most influenced priorities were budget issues (80%) and state legislature (69%), federal (67%), and governor priorities (65%). Issues related to program implementation and deimplementation were significantly higher priorities for state than for county policy makers.

Conclusions: These findings can inform the tailoring of dissemination and implementation strategies to account for the inner- and outer-setting contexts of substance use agencies.

Keywords: Adolescence; Implementation science; Policymakers; Public substance use agencies; Substance use; Youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean Priority and Factor of Influence Scores for Youth Substance Use Issues, State and County Officials, 2020 OUD= opioid use disorder

References

    1. Cavanaugh D, Kraft MK, Muck R, Merrigan DM. Toward an effective treatment system for adolescents with substance use disorders: The role of the states. Children and Youth Services Review 2011;33:S16–S22.
    1. Government Accountability Office. Adolescent and Young Adult Substance Use: Federal Grants for Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery Services and for Research, GAO-18–606 2018. https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-18-606.
    1. Winters KC, Botzet AM, Stinchfield R, et al. Adolescent substance abuse treatment: A review of evidence-based research. Adolescent Substance Abuse: Springer; 2018:141–171.
    1. Miller WR, Sorensen JL, Selzer JA, Brigham GS. Disseminating evidence-based practices in substance abuse treatment: A review with suggestions. Journal of substance abuse treatment 2006;31(1):25–39. - PubMed
    1. McGovern MP, Saunders EC, Kim E. Substance abuse treatment implementation research. Journal of substance abuse treatment 2013;44(1):1–3. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types