Spatial suppression of chromatic motion

Abstract

Center-surround antagonism, as a ubiquitous feature in visual processing, usually leads to inferior perception for a large stimulus compared to a small one. For example, it is more difficult to judge the motion direction of a large high-contrast pattern than that of a small one. However, this spatial suppression in the motion dimension was only reported for luminance motion, and was not found for chromatic motion. Given that center-surround suppression only occurs for strong visual inputs, we hypothesized that previous failure in finding spatial suppression of chromatic motion might be due to weak chromatic motion being induced with stimuli of limited parameters. In this study, we used phase-shift discrimination and motion-direction discrimination tasks to measure motion spatial suppression induced by stimuli of two spatial frequencies (0.5 and 2 cpd) and two contrasts (low and high). We found that spatial suppression of the chromatic motion was stably observed for stimuli of high spatial frequency (2 cpd) and high contrast and spatial summation occurred for stimuli of low spatial frequency (0.5 cpd). Intriguingly, there was no correlations between the motion spatial suppressions of luminance motion and chromatic motion, implying that the two types of spatial suppression are not originated from the same neural processing. Our findings indicate that spatial suppression also exists for chromatic motion, and the mechanisms underlying the spatial suppression of chromatic motion is different from that of luminance motion.

Keywords: Chromatic motion; Luminance motion; Psychophysics; Spatial suppression; Surround suppression.