Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):e046546.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046546.

Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol

Affiliations

Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol

Val Thurtle et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Health research in low-income and middle-income countries, which face the greatest burden of disease, is a vital component of efforts to combat global health inequality. With increased research, there has also been concern about ethical and regulatory issues and the state of research ethics committees, with various attempts to strengthen them. This scoping review examines the literature on ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa, with a focus on regulatory governance and leadership, administrative and financial capacity, and conduct of ethical reviews.

Methods and analysis: We will use the methodological approach proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and adapted by Levac et al and the Joanna Briggs Institute. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are based on the 'Population-Concept-Context' framework. Literature (from January 2000 to December 2020) will be searched in multiple databases including Embase and PubMed and websites of relevant organisations. All records will be screened by applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review flowchart: two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, and full text of included records. Using an inductive approach, we will synthesise the literature, identify best practice and gaps in evidence on strengthening research ethics committees.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required as the review will include only published literature. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at stakeholder meetings and conferences.

Keywords: medical ethics; organisational development; protocols & guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Commission on Health Research for Development . Health research: essential link to equity in development. Oxford University Press, 1990. http://www.cohred.org/downloads/open_archive/ComReports_0.pdf
    1. Hyder AA, Dawson L, Bachani AM, et al. . Moving from research ethics review to research ethics systems in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2009;373:862–5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60488-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alemayehu C, Mitchell G, Nikles J. Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries- a systematic review. Int J Equity Health 2018;17:37. 10.1186/s12939-018-0748-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ward CL, Shaw D, Sprumont D, et al. . Good collaborative practice: reforming capacity building governance of international health research partnerships. Global Health 2018;14:1. 10.1186/s12992-017-0319-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ezeome ER, Simon C. Ethical problems in conducting research in acute epidemics: the pfizer meningitis study in Nigeria as an illustration. Dev World Bioeth 2010;10:1–10. 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2008.00239.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types