Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 9:15:101105.
doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101105. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Which treatment to prevent an imminent fracture?

Affiliations
Review

Which treatment to prevent an imminent fracture?

Iconaru Laura et al. Bone Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose: To provide a summarized state of the art of the relative efficacy and rapidity of action of pharmacological treatments to prevent imminent osteoporotic fractures.

Methods: We reviewed metanalyses (MA) and network metaanalyses (NMA) published during the last 10 years concerning the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis. We compared the anti-fracture efficacy and the rapidity of action of various agents versus placebo and versus risedronate.

Results: All bisphosphonates decrease the incidence of vertebral fractures compared with placebo. Ibandronate is the only one without demonstrated efficacy against non-vertebral and hip fractures. Zoledronate, denosumab and anabolic therapy are associated with a higher fracture risk reduction than oral bisphosphonates. Compared with risedronate, which significantly reduces the rate of hip fractures, zoledronate, denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide and romosozumab are more efficient for vertebral fractures but not for non-vertebral or hip fractures reduction. No studies have compared bone anabolic treatments with zoledronate or denosumab. Oral bisphosphonates significantly reduce fracture risk only after more than one year of therapy. A faster reduction of fracture risk is observed with zoledronate and denosumab, or with anabolic agents. For denosumab and anabolic agents, a sequential treatment is required to keep gains after treatment withdrawal.

Conclusions: In patients at high risk of imminent fracture, starting therapy with potent antiresorptive agents or with an anabolic agent seems most appropriate to promptly reduce the fracture risk. Available NMA/MA suggest that, compared to zoledronate and denosumab, anabolic agents have a higher efficacy for vertebral fractures but head-to-head studies are lacking.

Keywords: Anabolic; Bisphosphonate; Denosumab; Imminent fracture; Osteoporosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Data reported in NMA/MA (efficacy vs placebo) for vertebral fractures.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Data reported in NMA/MA (efficacy vs placebo) for non-vertebral fractures.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Data reported in NMA/MA (efficacy vs placebo) for hip fractures.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Data reported in NMA/MA (efficacy vs Risedronate) for vertebral fractures.

References

    1. Alarkawi D. Impact of osteoporotic fracture type and subsequent fracture on mortality: the Tromsø study. Osteoporos. Int. 2020;31:119–130. - PubMed
    1. Anastasilakis Clinical features of 24 patients with rebound-associated vertebral fractures after Denosumab discontinuation: systematic review and additional cases. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017;32(6):1291–1296. - PubMed
    1. Barrionuevo P. Efficacy of pharmacological therapies for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women: a network meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019;104:1623–1630. - PubMed
    1. Black Fracture intervention trial. Fracture risk reduction with alendronate in women with osteoporosis: the fracture intervention trial. FIT Research Group. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000;85(11):4118–4124. - PubMed
    1. Body Efficacy of teriparatide compared with risedronate on FRAX®-defined major osteoporotic fractures: results of the VERO clinical trial. Osteoporos. Int. 2020;31:1935–1942. - PMC - PubMed