Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1065-1067.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13967.

Change in Saliva RT-PCR Sensitivity Over the Course of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Affiliations

Change in Saliva RT-PCR Sensitivity Over the Course of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Zion Congrave-Wilson et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

This study investigates the timeframe that optimizes saliva sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection using reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Pannaraj reported receiving consultant fees from Sanofi-Pasteur and Seqirus, research funding from Pfizer and AstraZeneca for unrelated studies, and grants from MedImmune. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Saliva Sensitivity by Collection Timing After COVID-19 Onset Overall and in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Individuals
Saliva sensitivity in all 524 nasopharyngeal-positive paired samples from 256 participants (A) and participants who were symptomatic vs asymptomatic at time of specimen collection (B) grouped by collection timing after COVID-19 onset, defined as the earliest of either first symptom or first reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction positivity. Error bars indicate 95% CIs.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Interim guidelines for collecting and handling of clinical specimens for COVID-19 testing. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/guidelines-clinical-specim...
    1. Moreno-Contreras J, Espinoza MA, Sandoval-Jaime C, et al. . Saliva sampling and its direct lysis, an excellent option to increase the number of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests in settings with supply shortages. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58(10):e01659-e20. doi:10.1128/JCM.01659-20 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Riccò M, Ranzieri S, Peruzzi S, et al. . RT-qPCR assays based on saliva rather than on nasopharyngeal swabs are possible but should be interpreted with caution: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(3):e2020025. doi:10.23750/abm.v91i3.10020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jaafar R, Aherfi S, Wurtz N, et al. . Correlation between 3790 quantitative polymerase chain reaction-positives samples and positive cell cultures including 1941 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolates. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(11):e921. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1491 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nacher M, Mergeay-Fabre M, Blanchet D, et al. . Prospective comparison of saliva and nasopharyngeal swab sampling for mass screening for COVID-19. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:621160. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.621160 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms