Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr;23(3):415-424.
doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01289-6. Epub 2021 Aug 13.

Network Meta-Analysis Techniques for Synthesizing Prevention Science Evidence

G Seitidis  1 , S Nikolakopoulos  2   3 , E A Hennessy  4 , E E Tanner-Smith  5   6 , D Mavridis  2   7
Affiliations
Review

Network Meta-Analysis Techniques for Synthesizing Prevention Science Evidence

G Seitidis et al. Prev Sci. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Network meta-analysis is a popular statistical technique for synthesizing evidence from studies comparing multiple interventions. Benefits of network meta-analysis, over more traditional pairwise meta-analysis approaches, include evaluating efficacy/safety of interventions within a single framework, increased precision, comparing pairs of interventions that have never been directly compared in a trial, and providing a hierarchy of interventions in terms of their effectiveness. Network meta-analysis is relatively underutilized in prevention science. This paper therefore presents a primer of network meta-analysis for prevention scientists who wish to apply this method or to critically appraise evidence from publications using the method. We introduce the key concepts and assumptions of network meta-analysis, namely, transitivity and consistency, and demonstrate their applicability to the field of prevention science. We then illustrate the method using a network meta-analysis examining the comparative effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions for preventing hazardous drinking among college students. We provide data and code for all examples. Finally, we discuss considerations that are particularly relevant in network meta-analyses in the field of prevention, such as including non-randomized evidence.

Keywords: Consistency; Network Meta-Analysis; Prevention science; Ranking; Transitivity; Tutorial.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Achana, F. A., Sutton, A. J., Kendrick, D., Wynn, P., Young, B., Jones, D. R., et al. (2015). The effectiveness of different interventions to promote poison prevention behaviours in households with children: A network meta-analysis. PloS One, 10, e0121122.
    1. Baker, S. G., & Kramer, B. S. (2002). The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2, 1–5. - DOI
    1. Barth, J., Munder, T., Gerger, H., Nüesch, E., Trelle, S., Znoj, H., et al. (2016). Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: A network meta-analysis. Focus, 14, 229–243. - DOI
    1. Cameron, C., Fireman, B., Hutton, B., Clifford, T., Coyle, D., Wells, G., et al. (2015). Network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative cohort studies for assessing the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments: Challenges and opportunities. Systematic Reviews, 4, 1–8. - DOI
    1. Chaimani, A., Caldwell, D. M., Li, T., Higgins, J. P., & Salanti, G. (2017). Additional considerations are required when preparing a protocol for a systematic review with multiple interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 83, 65–74. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources