Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 13;16(8):e0256229.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256229. eCollection 2021.

Laughter influences social bonding but not prosocial generosity to friends and strangers

Affiliations

Laughter influences social bonding but not prosocial generosity to friends and strangers

R I M Dunbar et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Humans deploy a number of specific behaviours for forming social bonds, one of which is laughter. However, two questions have not yet been investigated with respect to laughter: (1) Does laughter increase the sense of bonding to those with whom we laugh? and (2) Does laughter facilitate prosocial generosity? Using changes in pain threshold as a proxy for endorphin upregulation in the brain and a standard economic game (the Dictator Game) as an assay of prosociality, we show that laughter does trigger the endorphin system and, through that, seems to enhance social bonding, but it does not reliably influence donations to others. This suggests that social bonding and prosociality may operate via different mechanisms, or on different time scales, and relate to different functional objectives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Mean (±se) (a) laughter rate (number of 15-sec scans on which subject was audibly laughing), (b) change in positive affect score and (c) change in negative affect score, for men (unfilled symbols) and women (filled symbols) in Experiment 1.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Mean±se (a) Change in pain threshold and (b) total donations, for men (unfilled symbols) and women (filled symbols) in Experiment 1.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Mean±se ratio of (a) donation to friend divided by donation to self and (b) donation to stranger divided by donation to friend, for men (unfilled symbols) and women (filled symbols) in Experiment 1.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Mean±se (a) frequency of laughter (number of laughs given) and (b) change in pain threshold, for men (unfilled symbols) and women (filled symbols) in Experiment 2.
Fig 5
Fig 5
Mean±se (a) change IOS score (with respect to rest of experimental group) and (b) donation, for men (unfilled symbols) and women (filled symbols) in Experiment 2.

References

    1. Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E. Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature. 2005;435: 673–676. doi: 10.1038/nature03701 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carter CS, Grippo AJ, Pournajafi-Nazarloo H, Ruscio MG, Porges SW. Oxytocin, vasopressin and sociality. Prog Brain Res. 2008;170: 331–336. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)00427-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donaldson ZR, Young LJ. Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality. Science. 2008;322: 900–904. doi: 10.1126/science.1158668 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mikolajczak M, Gross JJ, Lane A, Corneille O, de Timary P, Luminet O. Oxytocin makes people trusting, not gullible. Psych Sci. 2010;21: 1072–1074. - PubMed
    1. Daughters K, Manstead AS, ten Velden FS, De Dreu CK. Oxytocin modulates third-party sanctioning of selfish and generous behavior within and between groups. Psychoneuroendocrin. 2017;77: 18–24. - PubMed

Publication types