Recommendations for navigating the experiences of moral distress: A scoping review

Abstract

Background: Moral distress is a complex ethical phenomenon that occurs when one is not able to act according to their moral judgement. Consequences of moral distress negatively impact nurses, patient care, and the healthcare system. There is limited evidence on specific approaches to prepare nurses to manage these ethical situations.

Aim: The aim of this scoping review is to identify moral distress interventions for nurses who provide direct patient care, identify gaps in the current moral distress research, and determine areas of focus for future research on this topic.

Methods: We employed the framework outlined by Levac, Colquhoun, and O'Brien and Arksey and O'Malley to conduct a scoping review. These steps included the: identification of the research question, identification of relevant studies, study selection, charting the data, collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. We appraised the quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results: We identified 5206 articles from the selected databases. Once duplicates were removed, two independent reviewers each screened 4043 title and abstracts. We included 554 articles for full-text screening, with 10 studies included based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study designs included before-after studies (n = 4), randomized control trials (n = 3), concurrent mixed-methods studies (n = 2), and one controlled before-after study. All studies were conducted in acute care settings. In four studies, interventions focused on informing nurses on moral distress. Two interventions focused on increasing the nurses' reflexivity on their workplace experiences. One intervention included formal clinical mentoring and clinical ethics support through interprofessional rounds. Two studies utilized a multicomponent intervention. The overall moral distress scores significantly decreased after intervention implementation in three included studies. Three additional studies showed significant differences in specific survey item scores (e.g., "provision of less-than-optimal care" and "caring for patients they did not feel qualified to care for"), as compared to overall scores, after intervention implementation. In 70% of studies the amount of quality criteria met were 60% or higher according to the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Conclusion: Our review is the first to synthesize intervention studies pertaining to moral distress among nurses. The findings of this review demonstrate that there is no clear pattern regarding which strategies consistently minimize the effects of moral distress among nurses. Future interventions should be tested more broadly by increasing the sample size, assessing length of intervention in relation to moral distress scores, expanding the interventions to other units and institutions, and including other healthcare professionals. Tweetable abstract: We reviewed interventions to help nurses with moral distress. Findings show no clear pattern of strategies to minimize their moral distress.

Keywords: Interventions; Moral distress; Nurses; Scoping review.