Detection and PI-RADS classification of focal lesions in prostate MRI: Performance comparison between a deep learning-based algorithm (DLA) and radiologists with various levels of experience
- PMID: 34388625
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109894
Detection and PI-RADS classification of focal lesions in prostate MRI: Performance comparison between a deep learning-based algorithm (DLA) and radiologists with various levels of experience
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the performance of lesion detection and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) classification between a deep learning-based algorithm (DLA), clinical reports and radiologists with different levels of experience in prostate MRI.
Methods: This retrospective study included 121 patients who underwent prebiopsy MRI and prostate biopsy. More than five radiologists (Reader groups 1, 2: residents; Readers 3, 4: less-experienced radiologists; Reader 5: expert) independently reviewed biparametric MRI (bpMRI). The DLA results were obtained using bpMRI. The reference standard was based on pathologic reports. The diagnostic performance of the PI-RADS classification of DLA, clinical reports, and radiologists was analyzed using AUROC. Dichotomous analysis (PI-RADS cutoff value ≥ 3 or 4) was performed, and the sensitivities and specificities were compared using McNemar's test.
Results: Clinically significant cancer [CSC, Gleason score ≥ 7] was confirmed in 43 patients (35.5%). The AUROC of the DLA (0.828) for diagnosing CSC was significantly higher than that of Reader 1 (AUROC, 0.706; p = 0.011), significantly lower than that of Reader 5 (AUROC, 0.914; p = 0.013), and similar to clinical reports and other readers (p = 0.060-0.661). The sensitivity of DLA (76.7%) was comparable to those of all readers and the clinical reports at a PI-RADS cutoff value ≥ 4. The specificity of the DLA (85.9%) was significantly higher than those of clinical reports and Readers 2-3 and comparable to all others at a PI-RADS cutoff value ≥ 4.
Conclusions: The DLA showed moderate diagnostic performance at a level between those of residents and an expert in detecting and classifying according to PI-RADS. The performance of DLA was similar to that of clinical reports from various radiologists in clinical practice.
Keywords: Deep learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate; Prostate imaging reporting and data system; Prostate neoplasms.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
MRI-based Deep Learning Algorithm for Assisting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection: A Bicenter Prospective Study.Radiology. 2025 Mar;314(3):e232788. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232788. Radiology. 2025. PMID: 40067105
-
Prebiopsy Biparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2: A Multicenter Study.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Apr;212(4):839-846. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20498. Epub 2019 Feb 19. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019. PMID: 30779662
-
Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jan;53(1):283-291. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27283. Epub 2020 Jul 2. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021. PMID: 32614123
-
Comparison of diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement between PI-RADS v2.1 and PI-RADS v2: systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Radiol. 2022 Mar 1;95(1131):20210509. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210509. Epub 2021 Sep 14. Br J Radiol. 2022. PMID: 34520694 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jul;54(1):103-112. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27546. Epub 2021 Feb 11. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021. PMID: 33576169
Cited by
-
Utility of accelerated T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging with deep learning reconstruction in female pelvic MRI: a multi-reader study.Eur Radiol. 2023 Nov;33(11):7697-7706. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09781-z. Epub 2023 Jun 14. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37314472
-
Evaluation of a deep learning prostate cancer detection system on biparametric MRI against radiological reading.Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun;35(6):3134-3143. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11287-1. Epub 2024 Dec 19. Eur Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39699671
-
Anatomically guided self-adapting deep neural network for clinically significant prostate cancer detection on bi-parametric MRI: a multi-center study.Insights Imaging. 2023 Jun 19;14(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01439-0. Insights Imaging. 2023. PMID: 37337101 Free PMC article.
-
Recent trends in AI applications for pelvic MRI: a comprehensive review.Radiol Med. 2024 Sep;129(9):1275-1287. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01861-4. Epub 2024 Aug 3. Radiol Med. 2024. PMID: 39096356 Review.
-
Joint Cancer Segmentation and PI-RADS Classification on Multiparametric MRI Using MiniSegCaps Network.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 7;13(4):615. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040615. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36832103 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous